Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils

Open access
Bossio, D A, Scow, K M·1995·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The assumption that carbon and soil water content are major determinants of microbial community structure and function is rarely questioned because of substantial evidence of the impacts of these variables on specific populations and functions. The significance of carbon and water for metabolic diversity at the microbial community level was tested on the field scale in agricultural plots varying in carbon inputs and in whether they were flooded. Surface soils in which rice straw was incorporated or burned and which were flooded or unflooded were sampled at monthly intervals three times during the flooded winter period (January to March) and again 1 month postdraining. Biomass carbon and nitrogen were not affected by treatments, active bacterial counts showed slight increases, and respiration rates were increased by carbon inputs and flooding. Biolog microplates were inoculated with soil extracts to quantify the metabolic diversity of the soil microbial community. Canonical correspondence analysis and the Monte Carlo permutation testing showed that differences in substrate utilization patterns were significantly related (P < 0.001) to carbon and flooding treatments. Biolog substrates whose metabolism was altered by the treatments were consistent across dates and tended to be positively related (utilization enhancement) to carbon inputs and negatively related to winter flooding. The importance of carbon as an environmental variable increased over time after straw treatment, whereas the importance of water became evident after flooding and decreased after drainage. The effect of long-term rice straw incorporation on substrate utilization patterns at another field site was consistent with these results despite the dissimilarities of the two soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.61.11.4043-4050.1995

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Bossio, D. A., & Scow, K. M.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
1995-11
Volume
61
Issue
11
Pages
4043-4050
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W1514426390
Cited by
296
References
15
FWCI
24.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.61.11.4043-4050.1995
The paper
Bossio, D. A., & Scow, K. M. (1995). Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.11.4043-4050.1995

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.