The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Capacity of Nine Thermostable DNA Polymerases To Mediate DNA Amplification in the Presence of PCR-Inhibiting Samples
Open accessAbstract
The PCR is an extremely powerful method for detecting microorganisms. However, its full potential as a rapid detection method is limited by the inhibition of the thermostable DNA polymerase from Thermus aquaticus by many components found in complex biological samples. In this study, we have compared the effects of known PCR-inhibiting samples on nine thermostable DNA polymerases. Samples of blood, cheese, feces, and meat, as well as various ions, were added to PCR mixtures containing various thermostable DNA polymerases. The nucleic acid amplification capacity of the nine polymerases, under buffer conditions recommended by the manufacturers, was evaluated by using a PCR-based detection method for Listeria monocytogenes in the presence of purified template DNA and different concentrations of PCR inhibitors. The Ampli Taq Gold and the Taq DNA polymerases from Thermus aquaticus were totally inhibited in the presence of 0.004% (vol/vol) blood in the PCR mixture, while the Hot Tub , Pwo , rTth , and Tfl DNA polymerases were able to amplify DNA in the presence of 20% (vol/vol) blood without reduced amplification sensitivity. The DNA polymerase from Thermotoga maritima ( Ultma ) was found to be the most susceptible to PCR inhibitors present in cheese, feces, and meat samples. When the inhibitory effect of K and Na ions was tested on the nine polymerases, Hot Tub from Thermus flavus and rTth from Thermus thermophilus were the most resistant. Thus, the PCR-inhibiting effect of various components in biological samples can, to some extent, be eliminated by the use of the appropriate thermostable DNA polymerase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal
Schrader, C., Schielke, A., Ellerbroek, L., & Johne, R. (2012) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x · Cited by 2,118
Methods for the isolation and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes: a review
Gasanov, U., Hughes, D., & Hansbro, P. M. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.002 · Cited by 410
Effects of Amplification Facilitators on Diagnostic PCR in the Presence of Blood, Feces, and Meat
Abu Al-Soud, W., & Rådström, P. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.38.12.4463-4470.2000 · Cited by 398
Self-citationMejia, R., Vicuña, Y., Broncano, N., Sandoval, C., Vaca, M., Chico, M., Cooper, P. J., & Nutman, T. B. (2013) · The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.12-0726 · Cited by 273
Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon
Huggett, J. F., Novak, T., Garson, J. A., Green, C., Morris-Jones, S. D., Miller, R. F., & Zumla, A. (2008) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-1-70 · Cited by 250
“These measures include the careful selection of type of thermostable DNA polymerase [ 22 ], reduction in the amount of DNA template added to the reaction and the use of certain additives such as bovine serum albumin, which provide some resistance to inhibitors that may be present in blood [23].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Abu Al-Soud, W., & Rådström, P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3748-3753
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2102420071
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capacity of Nine Thermostable DNA Polymerases To Mediate DNA Amplification in the Presence of PCR-Inhibiting Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.10.3748-3753.1998
- The paper
- Abu Al-Soud, W., & Rådström, P. (1998). Capacity of Nine Thermostable DNA Polymerases To Mediate DNA Amplification in the Presence of PCR-Inhibiting Samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.10.3748-3753.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.