The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetically Engineered Saccharomyces Yeast Capable of Effective Cofermentation of Glucose and Xylose
Open accessAbstract
Xylose is one of the major fermentable sugars present in cellulosic biomass, second only to glucose. However, Saccharomyces spp., the best sugar-fermenting microorganisms, are not able to metabolize xylose. We developed recombinant plasmids that can transform Saccharomyces spp. into xylose-fermenting yeasts. These plasmids, designated pLNH31, -32, -33, and -34, are 2μm-based high-copy-number yeast- E. coli shuttle plasmids. In addition to the geneticin resistance and ampicillin resistance genes that serve as dominant selectable markers, these plasmids also contain three xylose-metabolizing genes, a xylose reductase gene, a xylitol dehydrogenase gene (both from Pichia stipitis ), and a xylulokinase gene (from Saccharomyces cerevisiae ). These xylose-metabolizing genes were also fused to signals controlling gene expression from S. cerevisiae glycolytic genes. Transformation of Saccharomyces sp. strain 1400 with each of these plasmids resulted in the conversion of strain 1400 from a non-xylose-metabolizing yeast to a xylose-metabolizing yeast that can effectively ferment xylose to ethanol and also effectively utilizes xylose for aerobic growth. Furthermore, the resulting recombinant yeasts also have additional extraordinary properties. For example, the synthesis of the xylose-metabolizing enzymes directed by the cloned genes in these recombinant yeasts does not require the presence of xylose for induction, nor is the synthesis repressed by the presence of glucose in the medium. These properties make the recombinant yeasts able to efficiently ferment xylose to ethanol and also able to efficiently coferment glucose and xylose present in the same medium to ethanol simultaneously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review
Sun, Y., & Cheng, J. (2002) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00212-7 · Cited by 6,070
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
DNA assembler, an in vivo genetic method for rapid construction of biochemical pathways
Shao, Z., Zhao, H., & Zhao, H. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn991 · Cited by 678
Challenges and opportunities in improving the production of bio-ethanol
Baeyens, J., Kang, Q., Appels, L., Dewil, R., Lv, Y., & Tan, T. (2015) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2014.10.003 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho, N. W. Y., Chen, Z., & Brainard, A. P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1852-1859
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2121356177
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetically Engineered Saccharomyces Yeast Capable of Effective Cofermentation of Glucose and Xylose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.64.5.1852-1859.1998
- The paper
- Ho, N. W. Y., Chen, Z., & Brainard, A. P. (1998). Genetically Engineered Saccharomyces Yeast Capable of Effective Cofermentation of Glucose and Xylose. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.5.1852-1859.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.