The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Strategy for Detection of Viruses in Groundwater by PCR
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the use of the PCR for detection of enteric viruses in groundwater. To do this, we used an improved sample-processing technique and a large-volume amplification protocol. The objective of this study was to use advanced molecular techniques to develop a rapid and simple method which can be used by the water industry for detection of viral contamination in a variety of water samples. The strategy described here fulfills the water industry’s need for a rapid, reliable, easily performed method for analyzing groundwater for virus contamination. Viruses were detected after concentration from at least 400 gallons (1,512 liters) of water by a filter adsorption and elution method, which resulted in a concentrate containing viruses. A total of 150 samples were analyzed by performing cell culture assays for enteroviruses and by performing reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analyses for enteroviruses, hepatitis A virus, and rotavirus. Thirteen samples (8.7%) produced cellular cytopathic effects when the Buffalo green monkey cell line was used. When primers specific for enteroviruses were used in RT-PCR, 40 of 133 samples (30.1%) tested positive for the presence of enterovirus RNA. When hepatitis A virus-specific primers were used, 12 of 139 samples (8.6%) were considered positive for the presence of hepatitis A viral RNA. The RT-PCR analysis performed with rotavirus-specific primers identified 18 of 130 samples (13.8%) that were positive for rotavirus RNA sequences. Our sample-processing technique and large-volume PCR protocol (reaction volume, 300 μl) resulted in sufficient removal or dilution of inhibitors so that more than 95% of the samples could be assayed by PCR. Because of its sensitivity for detecting viral nucleic acid sequences, PCR analysis should produce more positive results than cell culture analysis. Since either cell culture analysis or PCR can reveal only a “snapshot” of the quality of the groundwater being sampled, PCR seems to be a desirable rapid initial screening tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Cited by
PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal
Schrader, C., Schielke, A., Ellerbroek, L., & Johne, R. (2012) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x · Cited by 2,118
Pathogenic Human Viruses in Coastal Waters
Griffin, D. W., Donaldson, K. A., Paul, J. H., & Rose, J. B. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.1.129-143.2003 · Cited by 294
Colloid Transport in the Subsurface: Past, Present, and Future Challenges
McCarthy, J. F., & McKay, L. D. (2004) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2113/3.2.326 · Cited by 280
Fate of effluent-borne contaminants beneath septic tank drainfields overlying a karst aquifer
Katz, B. G., Griffin, D. W., McMahon, P. B., Harden, H. S., Wade, E., Hicks, R. W., & Chanton, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0244 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbaszadegan, M., Stewart, P., & LeChevallier, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 444-449
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2104607395
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Strategy for Detection of Viruses in Groundwater by PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.2.444-449.1999
- The paper
- Abbaszadegan, M., Stewart, P., & LeChevallier, M. (1999). A Strategy for Detection of Viruses in Groundwater by PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.2.444-449.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.