The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variation in Resistance of Natural Isolates of Escherichia coli O157 to High Hydrostatic Pressure, Mild Heat, and Other Stresses
Open accessAbstract
Strains of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from patients with clinical cases of food-borne illness and other sources exhibited wide differences in resistance to high hydrostatic pressure. The most pressure-resistant strains were also more resistant to mild heat than other strains. Strain C9490, a representative pressure-resistant strain, was also more resistant to acid, oxidative, and osmotic stresses than the pressure-sensitive strain NCTC 12079. Most of these differences in resistance were observed only in stationary-phase cells, the only exception being acid resistance, where differences were also apparent in the exponential phase. Membrane damage in pressure-treated cells was revealed by increased uptake of the fluorescent dyes ethidium bromide and propidium iodide. When strains were exposed to the same pressure for different lengths of time, the pressure-sensitive strains took up stain sooner than the more resistant strain, which suggested that the differences in resistance may be related to susceptibility to membrane damage. Our results emphasize the importance of including stress-resistant strains of E. coli O157 when the efficacy of a novel or mild food preservation treatment is tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alternative food-preservation technologies: efficacy and mechanisms
Lado, B. H., & Yousef, A. E. (2002) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01557-5 · Cited by 434
Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: A review
De Angelis, M., & Gobbetti, M. (2004) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200300497 · Cited by 422
Decontamination technologies for meat products
Aymerich, T., Picouet, P. A., & Monfort, J. M. (2008) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.007 · Cited by 408
Microbiological food safety assessment of high hydrostatic pressure processing: a review
Rendueles, E., Omer, M. K., Alvseike, O., Alonso-Calleja, C., Capita, R., & Prieto, M. (2011) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2010.11.001 · Cited by 399
High-pressure processing â effects on microbial food safety and food quality
Considine, K. M., Kelly, A. L., Fitzgerald, G. F., Hill, C., & Sleator, R. D. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01084.x · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Benito, A., Ventoura, G., Casadei, M., Robinson, T., & Mackey, B.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1564-1569
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2144646955
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in Resistance of Natural Isolates of Escherichia coli O157 to High Hydrostatic Pressure, Mild Heat, and Other Stresses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.4.1564-1569.1999
- The paper
- Benito, A., Ventoura, G., Casadei, M., Robinson, T., & Mackey, B. (1999). Variation in Resistance of Natural Isolates of Escherichia coli O157 to High Hydrostatic Pressure, Mild Heat, and Other Stresses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.4.1564-1569.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.