The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Methanotrophic Bacterial Populations in Soils Showing Atmospheric Methane Uptake
Open accessAbstract
The global methane cycle includes both terrestrial and atmospheric processes and may contribute to feedback regulation of the climate. Most oxic soils are a net sink for methane, and these soils consume approximately 20 to 60 Tg of methane per year. The soil sink for atmospheric methane is microbially mediated and sensitive to disturbance. A decrease in the capacity of this sink may have contributed to the ∼1% · year −1 increase in the atmospheric methane level in this century. The organisms responsible for methane uptake by soils (the atmospheric methane sink) are not known, and factors that influence the activity of these organisms are poorly understood. In this study the soil methane-oxidizing population was characterized by both labelling soil microbiota with 14 CH 4 and analyzing a total soil monooxygenase gene library. Comparative analyses of [ 14 C]phospholipid ester-linked fatty acid profiles performed with representative methane-oxidizing bacteria revealed that the soil sink for atmospheric methane consists of an unknown group of methanotrophic bacteria that exhibit some similarity to type II methanotrophs. An analysis of monooxygenase gene libraries from the same soil samples indicated that an unknown group of bacteria belonging to the α subclass of the class Proteobacteria was present; these organisms were only distantly related to extant methane-oxidizing strains. Studies on factors that affect the activity, population dynamics, and contribution to global methane flux of “atmospheric methane oxidizers” should be greatly facilitated by use of biomarkers identified in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
King, G. M., & Schnell, S. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370282a0 · Cited by 220
Cited by
Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review
Le Mer, J., & Roger, P. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Biology · doi:10.1016/s1164-5563(01)01067-6 · Cited by 2,123
Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments
Bodelier, P. L. E., & Laanbroek, H. J. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00304-0 · Cited by 829
Semrau, J. D., DiSpirito, A. A., & Yoon, S. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00212.x · Cited by 760
Nisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Myhre, C. L., Platt, S. M., Allen, G., Bousquet, P., et al. (2019) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2018gb006009 · Cited by 735
Methane Feedbacks to the Global Climate System in a Warmer World
Dean, J. F., Middelburg, J. J., Röckmann, T., Aerts, R., Blauw, L. G., Egger, M., Jetten, M. S. M., de Jong, A. E. E., Meisel, O. H., Rasigraf, O., et al. (2018) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2017rg000559 · Cited by 630
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, A. J., Roslev, P., McDonald, I. R., Iversen, N., Henriksen, K., & Murrell, J. C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3312-3318
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1839637775
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Methanotrophic Bacterial Populations in Soils Showing Atmospheric Methane Uptake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.8.3312-3318.1999
- The paper
- Holmes, A. J., Roslev, P., McDonald, I. R., Iversen, N., Henriksen, K., & Murrell, J. C. (1999). Characterization of Methanotrophic Bacterial Populations in Soils Showing Atmospheric Methane Uptake. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.8.3312-3318.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.