The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of rpoS Deletion on Escherichia coli Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Slow growth has been hypothesized to be an essential aspect of bacterial physiology within biofilms. In order to test this hypothesis, we employed two strains of Escherichia coli , ZK126 (Δ lacZ rpoS + ) and its isogenic Δ rpoS derivative, ZK1000. These strains were grown at two rates (0.033 and 0.0083 h −1 ) in a glucose-limited chemostat which was coupled either to a modified Robbins device containing plugs of silicone rubber urinary catheter material or to a glass flow cell. The presence or absence of rpoS did not significantly affect planktonic growth of E. coli . In contrast, biofilm cell density in the rpoS mutant strain (ZK1000), as measured by determining the number of CFU per square centimeter, was reduced by 50% ( P < 0.05). Deletion of rpoS caused differences in biofilm cell arrangement, as seen by scanning confocal laser microscopy. In reporter gene experiments, similar levels of rpoS expression were seen in chemostat-grown planktonic and biofilm populations at a growth rate of 0.033 h −1 . Overall, these studies suggest that rpoS is important for biofilm physiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose
Solano, C., García, B., Valle, J., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Gamazo, C., & Lasa, I. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02802.x · Cited by 554
Role of Biofilms in Antimicrobial Resistance
Donlan, R. M. (2000) · ASAIO Journal · doi:10.1097/00002480-200011000-00037 · Cited by 351
Increased Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Mature Biofilms
Ito, A., Taniuchi, A., May, T., Kawata, K., & Okabe, S. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02949-08 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, J. L., & McLean, R. J. C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4285-4287
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2146396296
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of rpoS Deletion on Escherichia coli Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.9.4285-4287.1999
- The paper
- Adams, J. L., & McLean, R. J. C. (1999). Impact of rpoS Deletion on Escherichia coli Biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.9.4285-4287.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.