The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of an Urban Effluent on Antibiotic Resistance of Riverine Enterobacteriaceae and Aeromonas spp
Open accessAbstract
In order to evaluate the impact of an urban effluent on antibiotic resistance of freshwater bacterial populations, water samples were collected from the Arga river (Spain), upstream and downstream from the wastewater discharge of the city of Pamplona. Strains of Enterobacteriaceae (representative of the human and animal commensal flora) (110 isolates) and Aeromonas (typically waterborne bacteria) (118 isolates) were selected for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Most of the Aeromonas strains (72%) and many of the Enterobacteriaceae (20%) were resistant to nalidixic acid. Singly nalidixic acid-resistant strains were frequent regardless of the sampling site for Aeromonas , whereas they were more common upstream from the discharge for enterobacteria. The most common resistances to antibiotics other than quinolones were to tetracycline (24.3%) and beta-lactams (20.5%) for Enterobacteriaceae and to tetracycline (27.5%) and co-trimoxazole (26.6%) for Aeromonas . The rates of these antibiotic resistances increased downstream from the discharge at similar degrees for the two bacterial groups; it remained at high levels for enterobacteria but decreased along the 30-km study zone for Aeromonas . Genetic analysis of representative strains demonstrated that these resistances were mostly (enterobacteria) or exclusively ( Aeromonas ) chromosomally mediated. Moreover, a reference strain of Aeromonas caviae (CIP 7616) could not be transformed with conjugative R plasmids of enterobacteria. Thus, the urban effluent resulted in an increase of the rates of resistance to antibiotics other than quinolones in the riverine bacterial populations, despite limited genetic exchanges between enterobacteria and Aeromonas . Quinolone resistance probably was selected by heavy antibiotic discharges of unknown origin upstream from the urban effluent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 · Cited by 2,795
Chee-Sanford, J. C., Aminov, R. I., Krapac, I. J., Garrigues-Jeanjean, N., & Mackie, R. I. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.4.1494-1502.2001 · Cited by 773
Wastewater-based epidemiology biomarkers: Past, present and future
Choi, P. M., Tscharke, B. J., Donner, E., O'Brien, J. W., Grant, S. C., Kaserzon, S. L., Mackie, R., O'Malley, E., Crosbie, N. D., Thomas, K. V., et al. (2018) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.06.004 · Cited by 486
Cantas, L., Shah, S. Q. A., Cavaco, L. M., Manaia, C. M., Walsh, F., Popowska, M., Garelick, H., Bürgmann, H., & Sørum, H. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00096 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Goñi-Urriza, M., Capdepuy, M., Arpin, C., Raymond, N., Caumette, P., & Quentin, C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-132
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1965420084
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of an Urban Effluent on Antibiotic Resistance of Riverine Enterobacteriaceae and Aeromonas spp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.66.1.125-132.2000
- The paper
- Goñi-Urriza, M., Capdepuy, M., Arpin, C., Raymond, N., Caumette, P., & Quentin, C. (2000). Impact of an Urban Effluent on Antibiotic Resistance of Riverine Enterobacteriaceae and Aeromonas spp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.66.1.125-132.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.