The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Study of Bacterial Groups within the Human Cecal and Fecal Microbiota
Open accessAbstract
The composition of the human cecal microbiota is poorly known because of sampling difficulties. Samples of cecal fluid from eight subjects were collected via an intestinal tube. Feces were also collected. Total anaerobes, facultative anaerobes, bifidobacteria, and Bacteroides were enumerated by culture methods, and the predominant phylogenetic groups were quantified by molecular hybridization using a set of six rRNA-targeted probes. The numbers of strict anaerobes, bifidobacteria, Bacteroides , and members of the Clostridium coccoides group and Clostridium leptum subgroup were lower in the cecum. Facultative anaerobes represented 25% of total bacteria in the cecum versus 1% in the feces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of gastrointestinal pH profiles in normal ambulant human subjects
Evans, D. F., Pye, G., Bramley, R., Clark, A. G., Dyson, T. J., & Hardcastle, J. D. (1988) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.29.8.1035 · Cited by 1,240
Cited by
Through Ageing, and Beyond: Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory Status in Seniors and Centenarians
Biagi, E., Nylund, L., Candela, M., Ostan, R., Bucci, L., Pini, E., Nikkïla, J., Monti, D., Satokari, R., Franceschi, C., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010667 · Cited by 1,483
Zoetendal, E. G., von Wright, A., Vilpponen-Salmela, T., Ben-Amor, K., Akkermans, A. D. L., & de Vos, W. M. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.7.3401-3407.2002 · Cited by 868
Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease
Tamboli, C. P., Neut, C., Desreumaux, P., & Colombel, J. F. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.53.1.1 · Cited by 743
Bacterial translocation (BT) in cirrhosis†
Wiest, R., & Garcia‐Tsao, G. (2005) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20632 · Cited by 677
Review article: bifidobacteria as probiotic agents – physiological effects and clinical benefits
PICARD, C., FIORAMONTI, J., FRANCOIS, A., ROBINSON, T., NEANT, F., & MATUCHANSKY, C. (2005) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02615.x · Cited by 618
Metadata
- Authors
- Marteau, P., Pochart, P., Doré, J., Béra-Maillet, C., Bernalier, A., & Corthier, G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4939-4942
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2107853514
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Study of Bacterial Groups within the Human Cecal and Fecal Microbiota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.10.4939-4942.2001
- The paper
- Marteau, P., Pochart, P., Doré, J., Béra-Maillet, C., Bernalier, A., & Corthier, G. (2001). Comparative Study of Bacterial Groups within the Human Cecal and Fecal Microbiota. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.10.4939-4942.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
