Cited by 1,240Gastrointestinal motility and disordersAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsGastroesophageal reflux and treatments

Measurement of gastrointestinal pH profiles in normal ambulant human subjects

Open access
Evans, D F, Pye, G, Bramley, R, Clark, A G, Dyson, T J, Hardcastle, J D·1988·Gut

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) pH has been measured in 66 normal subjects using a pH sensitive radiotelemetry capsule passing freely through the gastrointestinal tract. Signals were recorded with a portable solid state receiver and recording system, enabling unconstrained measurements with normal ambulatory activities for up to 48 h during normal GI transit. Capsule position in the gut was monitored by surface location using a directional detector. Gastric pH was highly acidic (range 1.0-2.5) in all subjects. The mean pH in the proximal small intestine was 6.6 (0.5) for the first hour of intestinal recording. By comparison the mean pH in the terminal ileum was 7.5 (0.4) (p less than 0.001). In all subjects there was a sharp fall in pH to a mean of 6.4 (0.4) (p less than 0.001) as the capsule passed into the caecum. Values are means (SD). pH then rose progressively from the right to the left colon with a final mean value of 7.0 (0.7) (p less than 0.001).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.29.8.1035

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • aNFC/AP cryogels can generally protect acid-sensitive drugs in the gastric environment while achieving rapid release in the healthy small intestine, typically at a pH of 6.5-7.5.

    “This suggests that aNFC/AP cryogels can generally protect acid-sensitive drugs in the gastric environment while achieving rapid release in the healthy small intestine, typically at a pH of 6.5–7.5 [52].”

    From Amidated Pectin/Nanocellulose Hybrid Cryogel System with a pH-Responsive Release Profile for Small Intestinal Delivery (2025) · cites this paper as [52]

    The small-bowel results report mean pH values of 6.6 proximally, 7.4 in the mid small bowel, and 7.5 distally; the Results also describe a transition from an acidic stomach to a near-neutral small intestine. These measurements support the gastrointestinal pH context, but the paper does not test aNFC/AP cryogels, protection of acid-sensitive drugs, or rapid drug release. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Pietrousti A, Caprilli R, Guilano M, Serrano S, Vita S. Faecal pH in co!orectal cancer. ItalJ Gastroenterol 1985; 17: 88-91.
  2. Evans DF, Jones JA, Hardcastle JD. Ambulatory monitoring of gastrointestinal pH in man using a radio- telemetry capsule and a new solid state recorder. J Physiol 1985; 74: 4P.
  3. Evans DF. Ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring - An update. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 157-61.
  4. Ford PH, Pike GH. Decce series 4 user guide. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 1986.
  5. Da Cruz F. Kermit -A file transfer profile. Digital Press, 1984.
  6. Walker ARP, Walker BF, Segal I. Faecal pH value and its modification in S. African black and white school- children. S Afr Med J 1979; 55: 495-8.
  7. Stower MJ, Hardcastle JD. Five year survival of 1,115 patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1985; 11: 119-23.
  8. Evans DF, Pye G, Bramley RB, Dyson TJ, Balfour TW, Hardcastle JD. Is colonic pH important in colorectal cancer? [Abstract]. Gut 1986; 27: A1257.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, D. F., Pye, G., Bramley, R., Clark, A. G., Dyson, T. J., & Hardcastle, J. D.
Affiliations
Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1988-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1035-1041
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2089407496
Cited by
1,240
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 56
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gut (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Keywords
gastrointestinal pH, gastric pH, terminal ileum, cecum, colon, ambulatory pH monitoring, gastrointestinal transit, normal subjects
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Gastrointestinal Contents, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review