The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Serovars in Retail Chicken, Turkey, Pork, and Beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., Area
Open accessAbstract
A total of 825 samples of retail raw meats (chicken, turkey, pork, and beef) were examined for the presence of Escherichia coli and Salmonella serovars, and 719 of these samples were also tested for Campylobacter spp. The samples were randomly obtained from 59 stores of four supermarket chains during 107 sampling visits in the Greater Washington, D.C., area from June 1999 to July 2000. The majority (70.7%) of chicken samples (n= 184) were contaminated with Campylobacter, and a large percentage of the stores visited (91%) had Campylobacter-contaminated chickens. Approximately 14% of the 172 turkey samples yielded Campylobacter, whereas fewer pork (1.7%) and beef (0.5%) samples were positive for this pathogen. A total of 722 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from 159 meat samples; 53.6% of these isolates were Campylobacter jejuni, 41.3% were Campylobacter coli, and 5.1% were other species. Of the 212 chicken samples, 82 (38.7%) yielded E. coli, while 19.0% of the beef samples, 16.3% of the pork samples, and 11.9% of the turkey samples were positive for E. coli. However, only 25 (3.0%) of the retail meat samples tested were positive for Salmonella. Significant differences in the bacterial contamination rates were observed for the four supermarket chains. This study revealed that retail raw meats are often contaminated with food-borne pathogens; however, there are marked differences in the prevalence of such pathogens in different meats. Raw retail meats are potential vehicles for transmitting food-borne diseases, and our findings stress the need for increased implementation of hazard analysis of critical control point (HACCP) and consumer food safety education efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States
Mead, P. S., Slutsker, L., Dietz, V., McCaig, L. F., Bresee, J. S., Shapiro, C., Griffin, P. M., & Tauxe, R. V. (1999) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0505.990502 · Cited by 7,235
Emerging Foodborne Diseases: An Evolving Public Health Challenge
Tauxe, R. V. (1997) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0304.970403 · Cited by 635
Linton, D., Lawson, A. J., Owen, R. J., & Stanley, J. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997 · Cited by 569
Epidemiologic and Clinical Features of Campylobacter jejuni Infections
Blaser, M. J. (1997) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/513780 · Cited by 455
Kramer, J. M., Frost, J. A., Bolton, F. J., & Wareing, D. R. A. (2000) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-63.12.1654 · Cited by 323
Escherichia coli O157 : H7 and other enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli
Griffin, P. M. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 239
Epidemiology of foodborne diseases: a worldwide review.
Todd, E. C. D. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 200
Uyttendaele, M., Troy, P., & Debevere, J. (1999) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-62.7.735 · Cited by 180
Samadpour, M., Ongerth, J. E., Liston, J., Tran, N. T. A., Nguyen, D., Whittam, T. S., Wilson, R. A., & Tarr, P. I. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.3.1038-1040.1994 · Cited by 149
Contamination of meat with Campylobacter jejuni in Saitama, Japan
Kazuaki, O. N. O., & Yamamoto, K. (1999) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00015-x · Cited by 131
Cited by
Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives?: A Systematic Review
Smith-Spangler, C., Brandeau, M. L., Hunter, G. E., Bavinger, J. C., Pearson, M., Eschbach, P. J., Sundaram, V., Liu, H., Schirmer, P., Stave, C., et al. (2012) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007 · Cited by 602
Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: a review
Heredia, N., & García, S. (2018) · Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2018.04.006 · Cited by 554
Foley, S. L., Lynne, A. M., & Nayak, R. (2008) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0464 · Cited by 356
Thames, H. T., & Theradiyil Sukumaran, A. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9060776 · Cited by 164
Climate-sensitive health priorities in Nunatsiavut, Canada
IHACC Research Team, Harper, S. L., RICG, Edge, V. L., Ford, J., Willox, A. C., Wood, M., & McEwen, S. A. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1874-3 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, C., Ge, B., De Villena, J., Sudler, R., Yeh, E., Zhao, S., White, D. G., Wagner, D., & Meng, J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5431-5436
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2155542737
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 23.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Serovars in Retail Chicken, Turkey, Pork, and Beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., Area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.12.5431-5436.2001
- The paper
- Zhao, C., Ge, B., De Villena, J., Sudler, R., Yeh, E., Zhao, S., White, D. G., Wagner, D., & Meng, J. (2001). Prevalence of Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Salmonella Serovars in Retail Chicken, Turkey, Pork, and Beef from the Greater Washington, D.C., Area. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.12.5431-5436.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.