Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimization of Annealing Temperature To Reduce Bias Caused by a Primer Mismatch in Multitemplate PCR

Open access
Ishii, Kousuke, Fukui, Manabu·2001·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

To reduce PCR bias derived from a primer mismatch, the effect of the annealing temperature on the product ratio was investigated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products from a mixture of perfect-match and one-mismatch templates. These templates were generated by PCR from Pediococcus acidilactici for one mismatch and Micrococcus luteus for the perfect match. PCRs showed that the bias was reduced at lower temperatures. An environmental sample was also examined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.67.8.3753-3755.2001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Ishii, K., & Fukui, M.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2001-08
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
3753-3755
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2142686163
Cited by
225
References
0
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of Annealing Temperature To Reduce Bias Caused by a Primer Mismatch in Multitemplate PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.67.8.3753-3755.2001
The paper
Ishii, K., & Fukui, M. (2001). Optimization of Annealing Temperature To Reduce Bias Caused by a Primer Mismatch in Multitemplate PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.8.3753-3755.2001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.