Dimethylsulfoniopropionate: Its Sources, Role in the Marine Food Web, and Biological Degradation to Dimethylsulfide
Open accessAbstract
The massive quantities of phytoplankton in the North Atlantic and Antarctic oceans producing dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) as an osmoprotectant, much of which is degraded by marine bacteria to dimethylsulfide (DMS), ensures an important role for both compounds in the global sulfur cycle. The closest to a comprehensive review on this topic is a book of symposium proceedings edited by Kiene et al. (75); the more recent developments related specifically to DMSP degradation by microbial communities are found elsewhere (68). This article is more comprehensive, as it includes some of the earlier literature in describing the sources of DMSP, its release and linkage to the marine (primarily microbial) food web and subsequent degradation via cleavage to DMS and acrylic acid or demethylation and demethiolation to methanethiol. DMS production from DMSP has long been associated with marine algae according to the following reaction (20, 22): (1) DMSP is a tertiary sulfonium compound produced in high concentration by certain species of marine algae and plant halophytes for the regulation of their internal osmotic environment (1, 41, 47, 120), although its role in plants remains unclear. This alga-associated, i.e., particulate DMSP (DMSPp), when released into the marine environment as dissolved DMSP (DMSPd), can serve as a link between primary production and the microbial population, as it is readily degraded by chemoheterotrophic bacteria (59). DMSP turnover usually exceeds DMS production in natural waters (60) because DMSP is also demethylated to 3-methiolpropionate, which can be further demethylated to 3-mercaptopropionate or demethiolated, releasing methanethiol (72, 118). These reactions will be discussed in more detail below. The biogeochemical significance of DMSP cleavage was first suggested in 1972, when DMS was found to be universally present in seawater and emitted at a significant rate to the atmosphere (87). It was proposed that DMS, rather than H2S from coastal waters and mud flats, was the missing gaseous sulfur compound needed to enable the steady-state flow of sulfur between marine and terrestrial environments, making DMS emissions a key step in the global sulfur cycle (87). Atmospheric H2S, which arises primarily from dissimilatory sulfate reduction in organic matter-rich environments, could never be measured in sufficient quantity to be the vehicle for transferring large quantities of sulfur from sea to air to land. The total annual flux of biogenic DMS released to the atmosphere ranges from 28 to 45 Tg of S year−1, at least 10-fold higher than from all other sources (Table (Table1).1). Recent, more comprehensive calculations of global annual DMS flux from the oceans gave values that ranged from 13 to 37 Tg of S year−1 (57). This sea-to-air flux represents about 50% of the global biogenic sulfur flux to the atmosphere (3). However, anthropogenic sulfur emissions dominate the sulfur flux, representing 80 to 90% of the input to the global sulfur cycle (12, 23, 88). TABLE 1. Estimates of natural emissions of organosulfur compoundsa The magnitude of the marine DMS emissions is all the more remarkable considering that over half of the DMSP released is demethylated (68) and that a significant fraction of the DMS is oxidized by bacteria in the water column before it can be released to the atmosphere (13, 64). While most of the biogenic sulfur emissions (primarily DMS) come from the oceans, those coming from salt marshes and coastal wetlands are many times higher on a unit area basis (112). DMS flux per unit area from these marine wetlands is also much higher than from any known terrestrial soil (2). The biogeochemical cycling of DMSP and its biological degradation products are shown in Fig. Fig.11. FIG. 1. Scheme representing the mechanisms of DMSP and DMS cycling in the marine water column and atmosphere. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; CCN, cloud-condensing nuclei; MMPA, 3-methiolpropionate; β-HP, β-hydroxypropionate; 3-MPA, 3-mercaptopropionate; ...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The contribution of biogenic selenium emissions to its global atmospheric budget is around 3 to 4 orders of magnitude smaller than for sulfur emissions, but selenium is up to 3 orders of magnitude more enriched in the volatile phase than sulfur.
“Even though the contribution of biogenic Se emissions to its global atmospheric budget is around 3 to 4 orders of magnitude smaller than for S emissions (approximately 6.5 × 109 g Se year−1 [40] versus approximately 35 × 1012 g S year−1 [93], a comparison of these fluxes with the average concentrations in seawater (8.9 × 10−1 g L−1 S and 1.6 × 10−7 L−1 Se) [47] illustrates that Se is up to 3 order”
From Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review (2015) · cites this paper as [93]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bioavailability and effects of microplastics on marine zooplankton: A review
Botterell, Z. L. R., Beaumont, N., Dorrington, T., Steinke, M., Thompson, R. C., & Lindeque, P. K. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.065 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review
Winkel, L., Vriens, B., Jones, G., Schneider, L., Pilon-Smits, E., & Bañuelos, G. (2015) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7064199 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
“5 × 109 g Se year−1 [40] versus approximately 35 × 1012 g S year−1 [93], a comparison of these fluxes with the average concentrations in seawater (8.”
BackgroundWagner-Döbler, I., Ballhausen, B., Berger, M., Brinkhoff, T., Buchholz, I., Bunk, B., Cypionka, H., Daniel, R., Drepper, T., Gerdts, G., et al. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.94 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Bioavailability of microplastics to marine zooplankton: effect of shape and infochemicals
Botterell, Z. L. R., Beaumont, N., Cole, M., Hopkins, F. E., Steinke, M., Thompson, R. C., & Lindeque, P. K. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02715 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
An overview of the potential environmental impacts of large-scale microalgae cultivation.
Usher, P. K., Ross, A. B., Camargo-Valero, M. A., Tomlin, A. S., & Gale, W. F. (2014) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2014.913925 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Durham, B. P., Grote, J., Whittaker, K. A., Bender, S. J., Luo, H., Grim, S. L., Brown, J. M., Casey, J. R., Dron, A., Florez-Leiva, L., et al. (2014) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.4056/sigs.4998989 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yoch, D. C.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yoch, Duane C.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5804-5815
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- PMC
- PMC134419
- OpenAlex
- W2041731317
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
- Keywords
- dimethylsulfoniopropionate, dimethyl sulfide, DMSP degradation, marine food webs, sulfur cycling, osmoprotection, phytoplankton, marine bacteria, demethylation, methanethiol, acrylic acid, DMS emissions, halophytes, North Atlantic
- MeSH terms
- Bacteria, Biodegradation, Environmental, Climate, Dealkylation, Phylogeny, Phytoplankton, Sulfides, Sulfonium Compounds, Water Microbiology, Food Chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review