Cited by 62Microbial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Draft genome sequence of marine alphaproteobacterial strain HIMB11, the first cultivated representative of a unique lineage within the Roseobacter clade possessing an unusually small genome

Open access
Durham, Bryndan P., Grote, Jana, Whittaker, Kerry A., Bender, Sara J., Luo, Haiwei, Grim, Sharon L., Brown, Julia M., Casey, John R. +19 more·2014·Standards in Genomic Sciences

Abstract

Strain HIMB11 is a planktonic marine bacterium isolated from coastal seawater in Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii belonging to the ubiquitous and versatile Roseobacter clade of the alphaproteobacterial family Rhodobacteraceae. Here we describe the preliminary characteristics of strain HIMB11, including annotation of the draft genome sequence and comparative genomic analysis with other members of the Roseobacter lineage. The 3,098,747 bp draft genome is arranged in 34 contigs and contains 3,183 protein-coding genes and 54 RNA genes. Phylogenomic and 16S rRNA gene analyses indicate that HIMB11 represents a unique sublineage within the Roseobacter clade. Comparison with other publicly available genome sequences from members of the Roseobacter lineage reveals that strain HIMB11 has the genomic potential to utilize a wide variety of energy sources (e.g. organic matter, reduced inorganic sulfur, light, carbon monoxide), while possessing a reduced number of substrate transporters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4056/sigs.4998989

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [24]Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TG. Family I. Rhodobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, 2005, p. 161.
  2. [31]Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TG. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.
  3. [34]Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TG. Order III. Rhodobacterales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 161.
  4. [35]Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TG. Family I. Rhodobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part C, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 161.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durham, B. P., Grote, J., Whittaker, K. A., Bender, S. J., Luo, H., Grim, S. L., Brown, J. M., Casey, J. R., Dron, A., Florez-Leiva, L., Krupke, A., Luria, C. M., Mine, A. H., Nigro, O. D., Pather, S., Talarmin, A., Wear, E. K., Weber, T. S., Wilson, J. M., Church, M. J., DeLong, E. F., Karl, D. M., Steward, G. F., Eppley, J. M., Kyrpides, N. C., Schuster, S., & Rappé, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
Corresponding author
Rappé, Michael S.
Venue
Standards in Genomic Sciences
Published
2014-03-15
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
632-645
ISSN
1944-3277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082434558
Cited by
62
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Standards in Genomic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0424599)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (EF0424599)
  • University of Georgia
  • Agouron Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Roseobacter clade, Rhodobacteraceae, Alphaproteobacteria, draft genome sequence, genome annotation, comparative genomics, phylogenomics, 16S rRNA gene, small genomes, energy sources, Kaneohe Bay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review