The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coevolution of Bacteriophage PP01 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Continuous Culture
Open accessAbstract
The interaction between Escherichia coli O157:H7 and its specific bacteriophage PP01 was investigated in chemostat continuous culture. Following the addition of bacteriophage PP01, E. coli O157:H7 cell lysis was observed by over 4 orders of magnitude at a dilution rate of 0.876 h −1 and by 3 orders of magnitude at a lower dilution rate (0.327 h −1 ). However, the appearance of a series of phage-resistant E. coli isolates, which showed a low efficiency of plating against bacteriophage PP01, led to an increase in the cell concentration in the culture. The colony shape, outer membrane protein expression, and lipopolysaccharide production of each escape mutant were compared. Cessation of major outer membrane protein OmpC production and alteration of lipopolysaccharide composition enabled E. coli O157:H7 to escape PP01 infection. One of the escape mutants of E. coli O157:H7 which formed a mucoid colony (Mu) on Luria-Bertani agar appeared 56 h postincubation at a dilution rate of 0.867 h −1 and persisted until the end of the experiment (∼200 h). Mu mutant cells could coexist with bacteriophage PP01 in batch culture. Concentrations of the Mu cells and bacteriophage PP01 increased together. The appearance of mutant phage, which showed a different host range among the O157:H7 escape mutants than wild-type PP01, was also detected in the chemostat culture. Thus, coevolution of phage and E. coli O157:H7 proceeded as a mutual arms race in chemostat continuous culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Koskella, B., & Brockhurst, M. A. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12072 · Cited by 890
Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T., & Martiny, A. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac9323 · Cited by 834
Explaining Microbial Population Genomics through Phage Predation
Rodriguez-Valera, F., Martin-Cuadrado, A.-B., Rodriguez-Brito, B., Pašić, L., Thingstad, T. F., Rohwer, F., & Mira, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2235 · Cited by 663
Resistance Development to Bacteriophages Occurring during Bacteriophage Therapy
Oechslin, F. (2018) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v10070351 · Cited by 594
Population and evolutionary dynamics of phage therapy
Levin, B. R., & Bull, J. J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro822 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Mizoguchi, K., Morita, M., Fischer, C. R., Yoichi, M., Tanji, Y., & Unno, H.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 170-176
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2159275109
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coevolution of Bacteriophage PP01 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Continuous Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.1.170-176.2003
- The paper
- Mizoguchi, K., Morita, M., Fischer, C. R., Yoichi, M., Tanji, Y., & Unno, H. (2003). Coevolution of Bacteriophage PP01 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Continuous Culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.1.170-176.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.