The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monitoring the Bacterial Population Dynamics in Sourdough Fermentation Processes by Using PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis
Open accessAbstract
Four sourdoughs (A to D) were produced under practical conditions by using a starter mixture of three commercially available sourdough starters and a baker's yeast constitutively containing various species of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The sourdoughs were continuously propagated until the composition of the LAB flora remained stable. Two LAB-specific PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) systems were established and used to monitor the development of the microflora. Depending on the prevailing ecological conditions in the different sourdough fermentations, only a few Lactobacillus species were found to be competitive and became dominant. In sourdough A (traditional process with rye flour), Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis and a new species, L . mindensis , were detected. In rye flour sourdoughs B and C, which differed in the process temperature, exclusively L . crispatus and L . pontis became the predominant species in sourdough B and L . crispatus , L . panis , and L . frumenti became the predominant species in sourdough C. On the other hand, in sourdough D (corresponding to sourdough C but produced with rye bran), L . johnsonii and L . reuteri were found. The results of PCR-DGGE were consistent with those obtained by culturing, except for sourdough B, in which L . fermentum was also detected. Isolates of the species L . sanfranciscensis and L . fermentum were shown by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR analysis to originate from the commercial starters and the baker's yeast, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food
Ercolini, D. (2004) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2003.11.006 · Cited by 624
Dal Bello, F., Clarke, C. I., Ryan, L. A. M., Ulmer, H., Schober, T. J., Ström, K., Sjögren, J., van Sinderen, D., Schnürer, J., & Arendt, E. K. (2007) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2006.09.004 · Cited by 351
Yeast diversity of sourdoughs and associated metabolic properties and functionalities
De Vuyst, L., Harth, H., Van Kerrebroeck, S., & Leroy, F. (2016) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.018 · Cited by 304
Microbial ecology of cereal fermentations
Hammes, W. P., Brandt, M. J., Francis, K. L., Rosenheim, J., Seitter, M. F. H., & Vogelmann, S. A. (2005) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2004.02.010 · Cited by 279
Self-citationBiodiversity and identification of sourdough lactic acid bacteria
De Vuyst, L., & Vancanneyt, M. (2007) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2006.07.005 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Meroth, C. B., Walter, J., Hertel, C., Brandt, M. J., & Hammes, W. P.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 475-482
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2119570890
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring the Bacterial Population Dynamics in Sourdough Fermentation Processes by Using PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.1.475-482.2003
- The paper
- Meroth, C. B., Walter, J., Hertel, C., Brandt, M. J., & Hammes, W. P. (2003). Monitoring the Bacterial Population Dynamics in Sourdough Fermentation Processes by Using PCR-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.1.475-482.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.