The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity and Structure of Bacterial Communitiesin Arctic versus Antarctic PackIce
Open accessAbstract
A comprehensive assessment of bacterial diversity and community composition in arctic and antarctic pack ice was conducted through cultivation and cultivation-independent molecular techniques. We sequenced 16S rRNA genes from 115 and 87 pure cultures of bacteria isolated from arctic and antarctic pack ice, respectively. Most of the 33 arctic phylotypes were >97% identical to previously described antarctic species or to our own antarctic isolates. At both poles, the α- and γ-proteobacteria and the Cytophaga - Flavobacterium group were the dominant taxonomic bacterial groups identified by cultivation as well as by molecular methods. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries from multiple arctic and antarctic pack ice samples revealed a high incidence of closely overlapping 16S rRNA gene clone and isolate sequences. Simultaneous analysis of environmental samples with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that∼ 95% of 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained cells hybridized with the general bacterial probe EUB338. More than 90% of those were further assignable. Approximately 50 and 36% were identified asγ -proteobacteria in arctic and antarctic samples,respectively. Approximately 25% were identified asα -proteobacteria, and 25% were identified as belonging to the Cytophaga - Flavobacterium group. For the quantification of specific members of the sea ice community, new oligonucleotide probes were developed which target the genera Octadecabacter , Glaciecola , Psychrobacter , Marinobacter , Shewanella , and Polaribacter . High FISH detection rates of these groups as well as high viable counts corroborated the overlap of clone and isolate sequences. A terrestrial influence on the arctic pack ice community was suggested by the presence of limnic phylotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Pujalte, M. J., Lucena, T., Ruvira, M. A., Arahal, D. R., & Macián, M. C. (2014) · The Prokaryotes · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30197-1_377 · Cited by 353
Mühling, M., Woolven-Allen, J., Murrell, J. C., & Joint, I. (2008) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.97 · Cited by 304
Patterns of bacterial diversity across a range of Antarctic terrestrial habitats
Yergeau, E., Newsham, K. K., Pearce, D. A., & Kowalchuk, G. A. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01379.x · Cited by 256
Distinct flavobacterial communities in contrasting water masses of the North Atlantic Ocean
Gómez-Pereira, P. R., Fuchs, B. M., Alonso, C., Oliver, M. J., van Beusekom, J. E. E., & Amann, R. (2010) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.142 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Brinkmeyer, R., Knittel, K., Jürgens, J., Weyland, H., Amann, R., & Helmke, E.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6610-6619
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2171382116
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and Structure of Bacterial Communitiesin Arctic versus Antarctic PackIce. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.11.6610-6619.2003
- The paper
- Brinkmeyer, R., Knittel, K., Jürgens, J., Weyland, H., Amann, R., & Helmke, E. (2003). Diversity and Structure of Bacterial Communitiesin Arctic versus Antarctic PackIce. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.11.6610-6619.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.