Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Earthworm Gut: an Ideal Habitat for Ingested N2O-Producing Microorganisms

Open access
Horn, Marcus A., Schramm, Andreas, Drake, Harold L.·2003·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The in vivo production of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) by earthworms is due to their gut microbiota, and it is hypothesized that the microenvironment of the gut activates ingested N 2 O-producing soil bacteria. In situ measurement of N 2 O and O 2 with microsensors demonstrated that the earthworm gut is anoxic and the site of N 2 O production. The gut had a pH of 6.9 and an average water content of approximately 50%. The water content within the gut decreased from the anterior end to the posterior end. In contrast, the concentration of N 2 O increased from the anterior end to the mid-gut region and then decreased along the posterior part of the gut. Compared to the soil in which worms lived and fed, the gut of the earthworm was highly enriched in total carbon, organic carbon, and total nitrogen and had a C/N ratio of 7 (compared to a C/N ratio of 12 in soil). The aqueous phase of gut contents contained up to 80 mM glucose and numerous compounds that were indicative of anaerobic metabolism, including up to 9 mM formate, 8 mM acetate, 3 mM lactate, and 2 mM succinate. Compared to the soil contents, nitrite and ammonium were enriched in the gut up to 10- and 100-fold, respectively. The production of N 2 O by soil was induced when the gut environment was simulated in anoxic microcosms for 24 h (the approximate time for passage of soil through the earthworm). Anoxia, high osmolarity, nitrite, and nitrate were the dominant factors that stimulated the production of N 2 O. Supplemental organic carbon had a very minimal stimulatory effect on the production of N 2 O, and addition of buffer or ammonium had essentially no effect on the initial N 2 O production rates. However, a combination of supplements yielded rates greater than that obtained mathematically for single supplements, suggesting that the maximum rates observed were due to synergistic effects of supplements. Collectively, these results indicate that the special microenvironment of the earthworm gut is ideally suited for N 2 O-producing bacteria and support the hypothesis that the in situ conditions of the earthworm gut activate ingested N 2 O-producing soil bacteria during gut passage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.69.3.1662-1669.2003

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Horn, M. A., Schramm, A., & Drake, H. L.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2003-03
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
1662-1669
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2103236766
Cited by
264
References
29
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Earthworm Gut: an Ideal Habitat for Ingested N2O-Producing Microorganisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.69.3.1662-1669.2003
The paper
Horn, M. A., Schramm, A., & Drake, H. L. (2003). The Earthworm Gut: an Ideal Habitat for Ingested N2O-Producing Microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.3.1662-1669.2003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.