The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Census of the Bacterial Community of the Gypsy Moth Larval Midgut by Using Culturing and Culture-Independent Methods
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about bacteria associated with Lepidoptera, the large group of mostly phytophagous insects comprising the moths and butterflies. We inventoried the larval midgut bacteria of a polyphagous foliivore, the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.), whose gut is highly alkaline, by using traditional culturing and culture-independent methods. We also examined the effects of diet on microbial composition. Analysis of individual third-instar larvae revealed a high degree of similarity of microbial composition among insects fed on the same diet. DNA sequence analysis indicated that most of the PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes belong to the γ-Proteobacteria and low G+C gram-positive divisions and that the cultured members represented more than half of the phylotypes identified. Less frequently detected taxa included members of the α-Proteobacterium,Actinobacterium, and Cytophaga/Flexibacter/Bacteroides divisions. The 16S rRNA gene sequences from 7 of the 15 cultured organisms and 8 of the 9 sequences identified by PCR amplification diverged from previously reported bacterial sequences. The microbial composition of midguts differed substantially among larvae feeding on a sterilized artificial diet, aspen, larch, white oak, or willow. 16S rRNA analysis of cultured isolates indicated that an Enterococcus species and culture-independent analysis indicated that an Entbacter sp. were both present in all larvae, regardless of the feeding substrate; the sequences of these two phylotypes varied less than 1% among individual insects. These results provide the first comprehensive description of the microbial diversity of a lepidopteran midgut and demonstrate that the plant species in the diet influences the composition of the gut bacterial community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology
(1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-5-391_3 · Cited by 15,601
Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics
Stackebrandt, E. S., & Goodfellow, M. (1991) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 9,460
Lane, D. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,187
Liu, W. T., Marsh, T. L., Cheng, H., & Forney, L. J. (1997) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.63.11.4516-4522.1997 · Cited by 2,251
The ribosomal database project
Larsen, N., Olsen, G. J., Maidak, B. L., McCaughey, M. J., Overbeek, R., Macke, T. J., Marsh, T. L., & Woese, C. R. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.13.3021 · Cited by 1,520
16S rRNA sequences reveal numerous uncultured microorganisms in a natural community
Ward, D. M., Weller, R., & Bateson, M. M. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345063a0 · Cited by 1,383
Rondon, M. R., August, P. R., Bettermann, A. D., Brady, S. F., Grossman, T. H., Liles, M. R., Loiacono, K. A., Lynch, B. A., MacNeil, I. A., Minor, C., et al. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.6.2541-2547.2000 · Cited by 1,241
Self-citationEvolution of Resistance to Bacillus Thuringiensis
Tabashnik, B. E. (1994) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.39.010194.000403 · Cited by 1,150
O'Neill, S. L., Giordano, R., Colbert, A. M., Karr, T. L., & Robertson, H. M. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.7.2699 · Cited by 1,114
Cited by
Do diet and taxonomy influence insect gut bacterial communities?
Colman, D. R., Toolson, E. C., & Takacs‐Vesbach, C. D. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05752.x · Cited by 580
Drosophila lifespan enhancement by exogenous bacteria
Brummel, T., Ching, A., Seroude, L., Simon, A. F., & Benzer, S. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0405207101 · Cited by 317
Cox, C. R., & Gilmore, M. S. (2007) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.01496-06 · Cited by 300
Mohr, K. I., & Tebbe, C. C. (2006) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00893.x · Cited by 259
Gut Microbiota Mediate Insecticide Resistance in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella (L.)
Xia, X., Sun, B., Gurr, G. M., Vasseur, L., Xue, M., & You, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00025 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Broderick, N. A., Raffa, K. F., Goodman, R. M., & Handelsman, J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 293-300
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2154326098
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Census of the Bacterial Community of the Gypsy Moth Larval Midgut by Using Culturing and Culture-Independent Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.1.293-300.2004
- The paper
- Broderick, N. A., Raffa, K. F., Goodman, R. M., & Handelsman, J. (2004). Census of the Bacterial Community of the Gypsy Moth Larval Midgut by Using Culturing and Culture-Independent Methods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.1.293-300.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.