The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects.
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial endosymbionts of insects have long been implicated in the phenomenon of cytoplasmic incompatibility, in which certain crosses between symbiont-infected individuals lead to embryonic death or sex ratio distortion. The taxonomic position of these bacteria has, however, not been known with any certainty. Similarly, the relatedness of the bacteria infecting various insect hosts has been unclear. The inability to grow these bacteria on defined cell-free medium has been the major factor underlying these uncertainties. We circumvented this problem by selective PCR amplification and subsequent sequencing of the symbiont 16S rRNA genes directly from infected insect tissue. Maximum parsimony analysis of these sequences indicates that the symbionts belong in the alpha-subdivision of the Proteobacteria, where they are most closely related to the Rickettsia and their relatives. They are all closely related to each other and are assigned to the type species Wolbachia pipientis. Lack of congruence between the phylogeny of the symbionts and their insect hosts suggest that horizontal transfer of symbionts between insect species may occur. Comparison of the sequences for W. pipientis and for Wolbachia persica, an endosymbiont of ticks, shows that the genus Wolbachia is polyphyletic. A PCR assay based on 16S primers was designed for the detection of W. pipientis in insect tissue, and initial screening of insects indicates that cytoplasmic incompatibility may be a more general phenomenon in insects than is currently recognized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Cited by
Accelerated evolution and Muller’s Rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria
Moran, N. A. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873 · Cited by 1,017
The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachiado not walk alone
Duron, O., Bouchon, D., Boutin, S., Bellamy, L., Zhou, L., Engelstädter, J., & Hurst, G. D. (2008) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-27 · Cited by 733
Min, K.-T., & Benzer, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.20.10792 · Cited by 554
CASIRAGHI, M., ANDERSON, T. J. C., BANDI, C., BAZZOCCHI, C., & GENCHI, C. (2001) · Parasitology · doi:10.1017/s0031182000007149 · Cited by 508
Wolbachia endosymbionts responsible for various alterations of sexuality in arthropods
(1992) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0135 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Neill, S. L., Giordano, R., Colbert, A. M., Karr, T. L., & Robertson, H. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2699-2702
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2123331734
- Cited by
- 1,114
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.7.2699
- The paper
- O'Neill, S. L., Giordano, R., Colbert, A. M., Karr, T. L., & Robertson, H. M. (1992). 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.7.2699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.