The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Violacein-Producing Bacteria on Survival and Feeding of Bacterivorous Nanoflagellates
Open accessAbstract
We studied the role of bacterial secondary metabolites in the context of grazing protection against protozoans. A model system was used to examine the impact of violacein-producing bacteria on feeding rates, growth, and survival of three common bacterivorous nanoflagellates. Freshwater isolates of Janthinobacterium lividum and Chromobacterium violaceum produced the purple pigment violacein and exhibited acute toxicity to the nanoflagellates tested. High-resolution video microscopy revealed that these bacteria were ingested by the flagellates at high rates. The uptake of less than three bacteria resulted in rapid flagellate cell death after about 20 min and cell lysis within 1 to 2 h. In selectivity experiments with nontoxic Pseudomonas putida MM1, flagellates did not discriminate against pigmented strains. Purified violacein from cell extracts of C. violaceum showed high toxicity to nanoflagellates. In addition, antiprotozoal activity was found to positively correlate with the violacein content of the bacterial strains. Pigment synthesis in C. violaceum is regulated by an N -acylhomoserine lactone (AHL)-dependent quorum-sensing system. An AHL-deficient, nonpigmented mutant provided high flagellate growth rates, while the addition of the natural C. violaceum AHL could restore toxicity. Moreover, it was shown that the presence of violacein-producing bacteria in an otherwise nontoxic bacterial diet considerably inhibited flagellate population growth. Our results suggest that violacein-producing bacteria possess a highly effective survival mechanism which may exemplify the potential of some bacterial secondary metabolites to undermine protozoan grazing pressure and population dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemical defense ecology of marine unicellular plankton: constraints, mechanisms, and impacts
Wolfe, G. (2000) · The Biological Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1542526 · Cited by 263
Chernin, L. S., Winson, M. K., Thompson, J. M., Haran, S., Bycroft, B. W., Chet, I., Williams, P., & Stewart, G. S. A. B. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.17.4435-4441.1998 · Cited by 238
Cited by
Raaijmakers, J. M., De Bruijn, I., Nybroe, O., & Ongena, M. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00221.x · Cited by 1,131
Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications
Pernthaler, J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1180 · Cited by 803
Diversity and Natural Functions of Antibiotics Produced by Beneficial and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria
Raaijmakers, J. M., & Mazzola, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172908 · Cited by 674
Off the hook – how bacteria survive protozoan grazing
Matz, C., & Kjelleberg, S. (2005) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.05.009 · Cited by 648
Self-citationThe Evolution and Ecology of Bacterial Warfare
Granato, E. T., Meiller-Legrand, T. A., & Foster, K. R. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.024 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Matz, C., Deines, P., Boenigk, J., Arndt, H., Eberl, L., Kjelleberg, S., & Jürgens, K.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1593-1599
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2125082350
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Violacein-Producing Bacteria on Survival and Feeding of Bacterivorous Nanoflagellates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.70.3.1593-1599.2004
- The paper
- Matz, C., Deines, P., Boenigk, J., Arndt, H., Eberl, L., Kjelleberg, S., & Jürgens, K. (2004). Impact of Violacein-Producing Bacteria on Survival and Feeding of Bacterivorous Nanoflagellates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.3.1593-1599.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.