The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays To Identify and Quantify Fecal Bifidobacterium Species in Infants Receiving a Prebiotic Infant Formula
Open accessAbstract
A healthy intestinal microbiota is considered to be important for priming of the infants' mucosal and systemic immunity. Breast-fed infants typically have an intestinal microbiota dominated by different Bifidobacterium species. It has been described that allergic infants have different levels of specific Bifidobacterium species than healthy infants. For the accurate quantification of Bifidobacterium adolescentis , Bifidobacterium angulatum , Bifidobacterium bifidum , Bifidobacterium breve , Bifidobacterium catenulatum , Bifidobacterium dentium , Bifidobacterium infantis , and Bifidobacterium longum in fecal samples, duplex 5′ nuclease assays were developed. The assays, targeting rRNA gene intergenic spacer regions, were validated and compared with conventional PCR and fluorescent in situ hybridization methods. The 5′ nuclease assays were subsequently used to determine the relative amounts of different Bifidobacterium species in fecal samples from infants receiving a standard formula or a standard formula supplemented with galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides (OSF). A breast-fed group was studied in parallel as a reference. The results showed a significant increase in the total amount of fecal bifidobacteria (54.8% ± 9.8% to 73.4% ± 4.0%) in infants receiving the prebiotic formula (OSF), with a diversity of Bifidobacterium species similar to breast-fed infants. The intestinal microbiota of infants who received a standard formula seems to resemble a more adult-like distribution of bifidobacteria and contains relatively more B. catenulatum and B. adolescentis (2.71% ± 1.92% and 8.11% ± 4.12%, respectively, versus 0.15% ± 0.11% and 1.38% ± 0.98% for the OSF group). In conclusion, the specific prebiotic infant formula used induces a fecal microbiota that closely resembles the microbiota of breast-fed infants also at the level of the different Bifidobacterium species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonic Microbiota: Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics
Gibson, G. R., & Roberfroid, M. B. (1995) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.6.1401 · Cited by 7,667
Heid, C. A., Stevens, J., Livak, K. J., & Williams, P. M. (1996) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6.10.986 · Cited by 6,174
Bustin, S. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/jme.0.0250169 · Cited by 3,872
Nadkarni, M. A., Martin, F. E., Jacques, N. A., & Hunter, N. (2002) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-148-1-257 · Cited by 1,938
Harmsen, H. J. M., Wildeboer–Veloo, A. C. M., Raangs, G. C., Wagendorp, A. A., Klijn, N., Bindels, J. G., & Welling, G. W. (2000) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1002/j.1536-4801.2000.tb02655.x · Cited by 1,337
Franks, A. H., Harmsen, H. J. M., Raangs, G. C., Jansen, G. J., Schut, F., & Welling, G. W. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.9.3336-3345.1998 · Cited by 1,056
Langendijk, P. S., Schut, F., Jansen, G. J., Raangs, G. C., Kamphuis, G. R., Wilkinson, M. H., & Welling, G. W. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.8.3069-3075.1995 · Cited by 975
Saavedra, J. M., Bauman, N. A., Perman, J. A., Yolken, R. H., Saavedra, J. M., Bauman, N. A., & Oung, I. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91708-6 · Cited by 970
Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut
Collins, M. D., & Gibson, G. R. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1052s · Cited by 912
Cited by
Zmora, N., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Suez, J., Mor, U., Dori-Bachash, M., Bashiardes, S., Kotler, E., Zur, M., Regev-Lehavi, D., Brik, R. B.-Z., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041 · Cited by 1,695
Suez, J., Zmora, N., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Mor, U., Dori-Bachash, M., Bashiardes, S., Zur, M., Regev-Lehavi, D., Ben-Zeev Brik, R., Federici, S., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.047 · Cited by 1,184
Human milk glycobiome and its impact on the infant gastrointestinal microbiota
Zivkovic, A. M., German, J. B., Lebrilla, C. B., & Mills, D. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000083107 · Cited by 679
Interactions of gut microbiota with functional food components and nutraceuticals
Laparra, J. M., & Sanz, Y. (2010) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2009.11.001 · Cited by 684
Gut Bifidobacteria Populations in Human Health and Aging
Arboleya, S., Watkins, C., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01204 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Haarman, M., & Knol, J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2318-2324
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2111764708
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays To Identify and Quantify Fecal Bifidobacterium Species in Infants Receiving a Prebiotic Infant Formula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.71.5.2318-2324.2005
- The paper
- Haarman, M., & Knol, J. (2005). Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays To Identify and Quantify Fecal Bifidobacterium Species in Infants Receiving a Prebiotic Infant Formula. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.5.2318-2324.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
