The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a Novel Strain of Bacillus subtilis Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Healthy Chickens
Open accessAbstract
The objectives of this study were to isolate beneficial strains of microorganisms from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy chickens and to screen them against Clostridium perfringens , a causative agent of necrotic enteritis in poultry. One of the bacteria isolated, a strain of Bacillus subtilis , was found to possess an anticlostridial factor that could inhibit the C. perfringens ATCC 13124 used in this study. The anticlostridial factor produced by B. subtilis PB6 was found to be fully or partially inactivated in the presence of pronase, trypsin, and pepsin. In contrast, the antimicrobial activity of the anticlostridial factor was not affected by treatment at 100 or 121°C or by treatment with any of the organic solvents used in the study. The optimum growth temperature and optimum pH for production of the anticlostridial factor were 37°C and 6.20, respectively. Using the mass spectroscopy-mass spectroscopy technique, the apparent molecular mass of the anticlostridial factor was estimated to be in the range from 960 to 983 Da. In terms of the antimicrobial spectrum, the anticlostridial factor was inhibitory toward various strains of C. perfringens implicated in necrotic enteritis in poultry, Clostridium difficile , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Campylobacter jejuni , and Campylobacter coli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salminen, S., Isolauri, E., & Salminen, E. (1996) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf00395941 · Cited by 406
Piard, J. C., & Desmazeaud, M. (1992) · Le Lait · doi:10.1051/lait:199229 · Cited by 266
Cited by
Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet
Pan, D., & Yu, Z. (2014) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.26945 · Cited by 889
Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production
Mingmongkolchai, S., & Panbangred, W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13690 · Cited by 341
Thirabunyanon, M., & Thongwittaya, N. (2012) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.08.008 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Teo, A. Y.-L., & Tan, H.-M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4185-4190
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2102811797
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a Novel Strain of Bacillus subtilis Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Healthy Chickens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.71.8.4185-4190.2005
- The paper
- Teo, A. Y.-L., & Tan, H.-M. (2005). Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a Novel Strain of Bacillus subtilis Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tracts of Healthy Chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.8.4185-4190.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.