The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage
Open accessAbstract
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus has been identified as a risk factor for community-acquired and nosocomial infections. We screened 230 donors of diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and identified 62 (27%) whose nasal secretions were colonized by S . aureus . In 18 donors in whom the various regions of the nasal luminal surface were separately sampled, the predominant region of S . aureus colonization was the moist squamous epithelium on the septum adjacent to the nasal ostium. Nasal fluid from carriers was defective in killing endogenous S . aureus and nasal carrier isolates of S . aureus but not a laboratory S . aureus strain. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that S . aureus isolates incubated in nasal fluid from carriers for 2 h at 37°C were less damaged than those incubated in noncarrier fluid and were coated with an electron-dense layer. Compared with that from healthy donors and patients with acute rhinitis, nasal fluid from carriers contained elevated concentrations of the neutrophil-derived defensins human neutrophil peptides 1 to 3 (47- and 4-fold increases, respectively), indicative of a neutrophil-mediated inflammatory host response to S . aureus colonization. The concentration of the inducible epithelial antimicrobial peptide human β-defensin 2 was also highly elevated compared to that in healthy donors, in whom the level was below the detection limit, or patients with acute rhinitis (sixfold increase). Thus, nasal carriage of S . aureus takes hold in nasal fluid that is permissive for colonization and induces a local inflammatory response that fails to clear the colonizing bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
von Eiff, C., Becker, K., Machka, K., Stammer, H., & Peters, G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200101043440102 · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections
Wertheim, H. F., Melles, D. C., Vos, M. C., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Nouwen, J. L. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4 · Cited by 2,685
The commensal lifestyle of Staphylococcus aureus and its interactions with the nasal microbiota
Krismer, B., Weidenmaier, C., Zipperer, A., & Peschel, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.104 · Cited by 375
Corrigan, R. M., Miajlovic, H., & Foster, T. J. (2009) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-22 · Cited by 226
Clarke, S. R., Brummell, K. J., Horsburgh, M. J., McDowell, P. W., Mohamad, S. A. S., Stapleton, M. R., Acevedo, J., Read, R. C., Day, N. P. J., Peacock, S. J., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/501471 · Cited by 208
Mulcahy, M. E., Leech, J. M., Renauld, J.-C., Mills, K. H., & McLoughlin, R. M. (2016) · Mucosal Immunology · doi:10.1038/mi.2016.24 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, A. M., Tahk, S., Oren, A., Yoshioka, D., Kim, Y.-H., Park, A., & Ganz, T.
- Venue
- Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1064-1069
- ISSN
- 1071-412X (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6588
- OpenAlex
- W2116042789
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cdli.8.6.1064-1069.2001
- The paper
- Cole, A. M., Tahk, S., Oren, A., Yoshioka, D., Kim, Y.-H., Park, A., & Ganz, T. (2001). Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage. Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.8.6.1064-1069.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.