The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Coefficient of Variation in Assessing Variability of Quantitative Assays
Open accessAbstract
We have derived the mathematical relationship between the coefficient of variation associated with repeated measurements from quantitative assays and the expected fraction of pairs of those measurements that differ by at least some given factor, i.e., the expected frequency of disparate results that are due to assay variability rather than true differences. Knowledge of this frequency helps determine what magnitudes of differences can be expected by chance alone when the particular coefficient of variation is in effect. This frequency is an operational index of variability in the sense that it indicates the probability of observing a particular disparity between two measurements under the assumption that they measure the same quantity. Thus the frequency or probability becomes the basis for assessing if an assay is sufficiently precise. This assessment also provides a standard for determining if two assay results for the same subject, separated by an intervention such as vaccination or infection, differ by more than expected from the variation of the assay, thus indicating an intervention effect. Data from an international collaborative study are used to illustrate the application of this proposed interpretation of the coefficient of variation, and they also provide support for the assumptions used in the mathematical derivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence of microplastic accumulation in agricultural soils from sewage sludge disposal
Corradini, F., Meza, P., Eguiluz, R., Casado, F., Huerta-Lwanga, E., & Geissen, V. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.368 · Cited by 1,436
McPartland, J. M., Duncan, M., Di Marzo, V., & Pertwee, R. G. (2015) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12944 · Cited by 521
High-throughput Fluorometric Measurement of Potential Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities
Bell, C. W., Fricks, B. E., Rocca, J. D., Steinweg, J. M., McMahon, S. K., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2013) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/50961 · Cited by 489
Prediction of Water Level and Water Quality Using a CNN-LSTM Combined Deep Learning Approach
Baek, S.-S., Pyo, J., & Chun, J. A. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12123399 · Cited by 281
Anti–citrullinated peptide antibody assays and their role in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
Aggarwal, R., Liao, K., Nair, R., Ringold, S., & Costenbander, K. H. (2009) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.24827 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, G. F., Lynn, F., & Meade, B. D.
- Venue
- Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1235-1239
- ISSN
- 1556-679X (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6811
- OpenAlex
- W2128687617
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Coefficient of Variation in Assessing Variability of Quantitative Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cdli.9.6.1235-1239.2002
- The paper
- Reed, G. F., Lynn, F., & Meade, B. D. (2002). Use of Coefficient of Variation in Assessing Variability of Quantitative Assays. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.9.6.1235-1239.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.