The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-throughput Fluorometric Measurement of Potential Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities
Open accessAbstract
Microbes in soils and other environments produce extracellular enzymes to depolymerize and hydrolyze organic macromolecules so that they can be assimilated for energy and nutrients. Measuring soil microbial enzyme activity is crucial in understanding soil ecosystem functional dynamics. The general concept of the fluorescence enzyme assay is that synthetic C-, N-, or P-rich substrates bound with a fluorescent dye are added to soil samples. When intact, the labeled substrates do not fluoresce. Enzyme activity is measured as the increase in fluorescence as the fluorescent dyes are cleaved from their substrates, which allows them to fluoresce. Enzyme measurements can be expressed in units of molarity or activity. To perform this assay, soil slurries are prepared by combining soil with a pH buffer. The pH buffer (typically a 50 mM sodium acetate or 50 mM Tris buffer), is chosen for the buffer's particular acid dissociation constant (pKa) to best match the soil sample pH. The soil slurries are inoculated with a nonlimiting amount of fluorescently labeled (i.e. C-, N-, or P-rich) substrate. Using soil slurries in the assay serves to minimize limitations on enzyme and substrate diffusion. Therefore, this assay controls for differences in substrate limitation, diffusion rates, and soil pH conditions; thus detecting potential enzyme activity rates as a function of the difference in enzyme concentrations (per sample). Fluorescence enzyme assays are typically more sensitive than spectrophotometric (i.e. colorimetric) assays, but can suffer from interference caused by impurities and the instability of many fluorescent compounds when exposed to light; so caution is required when handling fluorescent substrates. Likewise, this method only assesses potential enzyme activities under laboratory conditions when substrates are not limiting. Caution should be used when interpreting the data representing cross-site comparisons with differing temperatures or soil types, as in situ soil type and temperature can influence enzyme kinetics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere
Sterner, R. W., & Elser, J. J. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,476
Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Lauber, C. L., Weintraub, M. N., Ahmed, B., Allison, S. D., Crenshaw, C., Contosta, A. R., Cusack, D., Frey, S., Gallo, M. E., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01245.x · Cited by 2,593
Self-citationSoil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Self-citationC:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
Saiya-Cork, K. R., Sinsabaugh, R. L., & Zak, D. R. (2002) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00074-3 · Cited by 2,219
Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research
(1999) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195120837.001.0001 · Cited by 1,910
Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Hill, B. H., & Follstad Shah, J. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08632 · Cited by 1,751
Diversity of Rhizobium-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis: overview and perspectives
Martínez-Romero, E. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1024199013926 · Cited by 1,539
Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil
Sinsabaugh, R. L. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.014 · Cited by 1,480
Optimization of hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme methods for ecosystem studies
German, D. P., Weintraub, M. N., Grandy, A. S., Lauber, C. L., Rinkes, Z. L., & Allison, S. D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.03.017 · Cited by 1,349
Cited by
Jiao, S., Lu, Y., & Wei, G. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15917 · Cited by 485
Fang, Y., Nazaries, L., Singh, B. K., & Singh, B. P. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14154 · Cited by 382
Nutrient-induced acidification modulates soil biodiversity-function relationships
Hu, Z., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Fanin, N., Chen, X., Zhou, Y., Du, G., Hu, F., Jiang, L., Hu, S., & Liu, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47323-3 · Cited by 284
An evaluation of carbon indicators of soil health in long-term agricultural experiments
Liptzin, D., Norris, C. E., Cappellazzi, S. B., Bean, G. M., Cope, M., Greub, K. L. H., Rieke, E. L., Tracy, P. W., Aberle, E., Ashworth, A., et al. (2022) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108708 · Cited by 265
Bell, C., Carrillo, Y., Boot, C. M., Rocca, J. D., Pendall, E., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12531 · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, C. W., Fricks, B. E., Rocca, J. D., Steinweg, J. M., McMahon, S. K., & Wallenstein, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Visualized Experiments
- Publisher
- MyJove Corporation
- Published
- 2013-11-15
- Issue
- 81
- Pages
- e50961-e50961
- ISSN
- 1940-087X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035719017
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-throughput Fluorometric Measurement of Potential Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3791/50961
- The paper
- Bell, C. W., Fricks, B. E., Rocca, J. D., Steinweg, J. M., McMahon, S. K., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2013). High-throughput Fluorometric Measurement of Potential Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activities. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://doi.org/10.3791/50961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.