The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Status of Veterinary Vaccines
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The major goals of veterinary vaccines are to improve the health and welfare of companion animals, increase production of livestock in a cost-effective manner, and prevent animal-to-human transmission from both domestic animals and wildlife. These diverse aims have led to different approaches to the development of veterinary vaccines from crude but effective whole-pathogen preparations to molecularly defined subunit vaccines, genetically engineered organisms or chimeras, vectored antigen formulations, and naked DNA injections. The final successful outcome of vaccine research and development is the generation of a product that will be available in the marketplace or that will be used in the field to achieve desired outcomes. As detailed in this review, successful veterinary vaccines have been produced against viral, bacterial, protozoal, and multicellular pathogens, which in many ways have led the field in the application and adaptation of novel technologies. These veterinary vaccines have had, and continue to have, a major impact not only on animal health and production but also on human health through increasing safe food supplies and preventing animal-to-human transmission of infectious diseases. The continued interaction between animals and human researchers and health professionals will be of major importance for adapting new technologies, providing animal models of disease, and confronting new and emerging infectious diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis
Dubey, J. P., & Lindsay, D. S. (1996) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01035-7 · Cited by 968
Helminth parasites – masters of regulation
Maizels, R. M., Balic, A., Gomez‐Escobar, N., Nair, M., Taylor, M. D., & Allen, J. E. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00191.x · Cited by 866
Immunological mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy
Larché, M., Akdis, C. A., & Valenta, R. (2006) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1934 · Cited by 849
Translating Innate Immunity into Immunological Memory: Implications for Vaccine Development
Pulendran, B., & Ahmed, R. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.019 · Cited by 625
Dinulescu, D. M., Ince, T. A., Quade, B. J., Shafer, S. A., Crowley, D., & Jacks, T. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1173 · Cited by 604
Targeting the innate immune response with improved vaccine adjuvants
Pashine, A., Valiante, N. M., & Ulmer, J. B. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1210 · Cited by 555
Biological properties of RB51; a stable rough strain of Brucella abortus
Schurig, G. G., Roop, R. M., Bagchi, T., Boyle, S., Buhrman, D., & Sriranganathan, N. (1991) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0378-1135(91)90091-s · Cited by 464
Kuiken, T., Rimmelzwaan, G., van Riel, D., van Amerongen, G., Baars, M., Fouchier, R., & Osterhaus, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102287 · Cited by 453
Davis, B. S., Chang, G.-J. J., Cropp, B., Roehrig, J. T., Martin, D. A., Mitchell, C. J., Bowen, R., & Bunning, M. L. (2001) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.75.9.4040-4047.2001 · Cited by 447
Dunshea, F. R., Colantoni, C., Howard, K., McCauley, I., Jackson, P., Long, K. A., Lopaticki, S., Nugent, E. A., Simons, J. A., Walker, J., et al. (2001) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2001.79102524x · Cited by 420
Self-citation
Cited by
Applying extracellular vesicles based therapeutics in clinical trials – an ISEV position paper
Lener, T., Gimona, M., Aigner, L., Börger, V., Buzas, E., Camussi, G., Chaput, N., Chatterjee, D., Court, F. A., del Portillo, H. A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.3402/jev.v4.30087 · Cited by 1,491
Plant Cell Culture as Emerging Technology for Production of Active Cosmetic Ingredients
Georgiev, V., Slavov, A., Vasileva, I., & Pavlov, A. (2018) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201800066 · Cited by 139
An Overview of Avian Vaccination Options in Zoological Collections in Europe
Leus, J., Morel, M., Kempf, H., Vercammen, F., Nederlof, R. A., & Bakker, J. (2026) · Veterinary Sciences · doi:10.3390/vetsci13020148 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Meeusen, E. N. T., Walker, J., Peters, A., Pastoret, P.-P., & Jungersen, G.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 489-510
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2128953086
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 16.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Status of Veterinary Vaccines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00005-07
- The paper
- Meeusen, E. N. T., Walker, J., Peters, A., Pastoret, P.-P., & Jungersen, G. (2007). Current Status of Veterinary Vaccines. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00005-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
