The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Clinical Relevance of the Genus Arcobacter
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: The genus Arcobacter , defined almost 20 years ago from members of the genus Campylobacter , has become increasingly important because its members are being considered emergent enteropathogens and/or potential zoonotic agents. Over recent years information that is relevant for microbiologists, especially those working in the medical and veterinary fields and in the food safety sector, has accumulated. Recently, the genus has been enlarged with several new species. The complete genomes of Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter nitrofigilis are available, with the former revealing diverse pathways characteristic of free-living microbes and virulence genes homologous to those of Campylobacter. The first multilocus sequence typing analysis showed a great diversity of sequence types, with no association with specific hosts or geographical regions. Advances in detection and identification techniques, mostly based on molecular methods, have been made. These microbes have been associated with water outbreaks and with indicators of fecal pollution, with food products and water as the suspected routes of transmission. This review updates this knowledge and provides the most recent data on the taxonomy, species diversity, methods of detection, and identification of these microbes as well as on their virulence potential and implication in human and animal diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Campylobacter flagella: not just for motility
Guerry, P. (2007) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.006 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Dekker, D., Eibach, D., Boahen, K. G., Akenten, C. W., Pfeifer, Y., Zautner, A. E., Mertens, E., Krumkamp, R., Jaeger, A., Flieger, A., et al. (2019) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2018.2562 · Cited by 53
Giraud, C., Callac, N., Boulo, V., Lam, J.-S., Pham, D., Selmaoui-Folcher, N., & Wabete, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.886752 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Collado, L., & Figueras, M. J.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-192
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2142245778
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Clinical Relevance of the Genus Arcobacter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00034-10
- The paper
- Collado, L., & Figueras, M. J. (2011). Taxonomy, Epidemiology, and Clinical Relevance of the Genus Arcobacter. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00034-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.