Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 270 of the 270 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular and Nonmolecular Diagnostic Methods for Invasive Fungal Infections

Open access
Arvanitis, Marios, Anagnostou, Theodora, Fuchs, Beth Burgwyn, Caliendo, Angela M., Mylonakis, Eleftherios·2014·Clinical Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

SUMMARY: Invasive fungal infections constitute a serious threat to an ever-growing population of immunocompromised individuals and other individuals at risk. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as histopathology and culture, which are still considered the gold standards, have low sensitivity, which underscores the need for the development of new means of detecting fungal infectious agents. Indeed, novel serologic and molecular techniques have been developed and are currently under clinical evaluation. Tests like the galactomannan antigen test for aspergillosis and the β-glucan test for invasive Candida spp. and molds, as well as other antigen and antibody tests, for Cryptococcus spp.,Pneumocystis spp., and dimorphic fungi, have already been established as important diagnostic approaches and are implemented in routine clinical practice. On the other hand, PCR and other molecular approaches, such as matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), have proved promising in clinical trials but still need to undergo standardization before their clinical use can become widespread. The purpose of this review is to highlight the different diagnostic approaches that are currently utilized or under development for invasive fungal infections and to identify their performance characteristics and the challenges associated with their use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/cmr.00091-13

Cites

270 of 270 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 270 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Arvanitis, M., Anagnostou, T., Fuchs, B. B., Caliendo, A. M., & Mylonakis, E.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Published
2014-07
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
490-526
ISSN
  • 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6618
OpenAlex
W2102406508
Cited by
353
References
270
FWCI
21.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular and Nonmolecular Diagnostic Methods for Invasive Fungal Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00091-13
The paper
Arvanitis, M., Anagnostou, T., Fuchs, B. B., Caliendo, A. M., & Mylonakis, E. (2014). Molecular and Nonmolecular Diagnostic Methods for Invasive Fungal Infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00091-13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.