Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods

Open access
Viau, Roberto, Frank, Karen M., Jacobs, Michael R., Wilson, Brigid, Kaye, Keith, Donskey, Curtis J., Perez, Federico, Endimiani, Andrea, Bonomo, Robert A.·2016·Clinical Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

SUMMARY: Carbapenemases have become a significant mechanism for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. Intestinal carriage of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) is an important source of transmission. Isolation of carriers is one strategy that can be used to limit the spread of these bacteria. In this review, we critically examine the clinical performance, advantages, and disadvantages of methods available for the detection of intestinal carriage of CPOs. Culture-based methods (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] protocols, chromogenic media, specialized agars, and double-disk synergy tests) for detecting carriage of CPOs are convenient due to their ready availability and low cost, but their limited sensitivity and long turnaround time may not always be optimal for infection control practices. Contemporary nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs) such as real-time PCR, hybridization assays, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), or a combined culture and NAAT approach may provide fast results and/or added sensitivity and specificity compared with culture-based methods. Infection control practitioners and clinical microbiologists should be aware of the strengths and limitations of available methods to determine the most suitable approach for their medical facility to fit their infection control needs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/cmr.00108-14

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Viau, R., Frank, K. M., Jacobs, M. R., Wilson, B., Kaye, K., Donskey, C. J., Perez, F., Endimiani, A., & Bonomo, R. A.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Published
2016-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6618
OpenAlex
W1827563865
Cited by
181
References
4
FWCI
11.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00108-14
The paper
Viau, R., Frank, K. M., Jacobs, M. R., Wilson, B., Kaye, K., Donskey, C. J., Perez, F., Endimiani, A., & Bonomo, R. A. (2016). Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00108-14

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.