The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Carbapenemases have become a significant mechanism for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. Intestinal carriage of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) is an important source of transmission. Isolation of carriers is one strategy that can be used to limit the spread of these bacteria. In this review, we critically examine the clinical performance, advantages, and disadvantages of methods available for the detection of intestinal carriage of CPOs. Culture-based methods (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] protocols, chromogenic media, specialized agars, and double-disk synergy tests) for detecting carriage of CPOs are convenient due to their ready availability and low cost, but their limited sensitivity and long turnaround time may not always be optimal for infection control practices. Contemporary nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs) such as real-time PCR, hybridization assays, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), or a combined culture and NAAT approach may provide fast results and/or added sensitivity and specificity compared with culture-based methods. Infection control practitioners and clinical microbiologists should be aware of the strengths and limitations of available methods to determine the most suitable approach for their medical facility to fit their infection control needs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 · Cited by 3,369
Yigit, H., Queenan, A. M., Anderson, G. J., Domenech-Sanchez, A., Biddle, J. W., Steward, C. D., Alberti, S., Bush, K., & Tenover, F. C. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.1151-1161.2001 · Cited by 1,639
The ABCD’s of β-lactamase nomenclature
Bush, K. (2013) · Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10156-013-0640-7 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Khan, A. U., Maryam, L., & Zarrilli, R. (2017) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-017-1012-8 · Cited by 512
The rapid spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Potter, R. F., D’Souza, A. W., & Dantas, G. (2016) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2016.09.002 · Cited by 403
Sheppard, A. E., Stoesser, N., Wilson, D. J., Sebra, R., Kasarskis, A., Anson, L. W., Giess, A., Pankhurst, L. J., Vaughan, A., Grim, C. J., et al. (2016) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00464-16 · Cited by 295
Bahr, G., González, L. J., & Vila, A. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00138 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Viau, R., Frank, K. M., Jacobs, M. R., Wilson, B., Kaye, K., Donskey, C. J., Perez, F., Endimiani, A., & Bonomo, R. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W1827563865
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00108-14
- The paper
- Viau, R., Frank, K. M., Jacobs, M. R., Wilson, B., Kaye, K., Donskey, C. J., Perez, F., Endimiani, A., & Bonomo, R. A. (2016). Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00108-14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.