The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biosensors for Whole-Cell Bacterial Detection
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Bacterial pathogens are important targets for detection and identification in medicine, food safety, public health, and security. Bacterial infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In spite of the availability of antibiotics, these infections are often misdiagnosed or there is an unacceptable delay in diagnosis. Current methods of bacterial detection rely upon laboratory-based techniques such as cell culture, microscopic analysis, and biochemical assays. These procedures are time-consuming and costly and require specialist equipment and trained users. Portable stand-alone biosensors can facilitate rapid detection and diagnosis at the point of care. Biosensors will be particularly useful where a clear diagnosis informs treatment, in critical illness (e.g., meningitis) or to prevent further disease spread (e.g., in case of food-borne pathogens or sexually transmitted diseases). Detection of bacteria is also becoming increasingly important in antibioterrorism measures (e.g., anthrax detection). In this review, we discuss recent progress in the use of biosensors for the detection of whole bacterial cells for sensitive and earlier identification of bacteria without the need for sample processing. There is a particular focus on electrochemical biosensors, especially impedance-based systems, as these present key advantages in terms of ease of miniaturization, lack of reagents, sensitivity, and low cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies
Muyldermans, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-063011-092449 · Cited by 2,304
Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review
Fan, X., White, I. M., Shopova, S. I., Zhu, H., Suter, J. D., & Sun, Y. (2008) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2008.05.022 · Cited by 2,187
Recent Advances in Understanding Enteric Pathogenic Escherichia coli
Croxen, M. A., Law, R. J., Scholz, R., Keeney, K. M., Wlodarska, M., & Finlay, B. B. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00022-13 · Cited by 1,569
Katz, E., & Willner, I. (2003) · Electroanalysis · doi:10.1002/elan.200390114 · Cited by 1,351
Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing
Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R., et al. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.1.165-256.2006 · Cited by 1,318
Label‐Free Impedance Biosensors: Opportunities and Challenges
Daniels, J. S., & Pourmand, N. (2007) · Electroanalysis · doi:10.1002/elan.200603855 · Cited by 1,192
Sepúlveda, B., Angelomé, P. C., Lechuga, L. M., & Liz-Marzán, L. M. (2009) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2009.04.001 · Cited by 1,023
Comparative advantages of mechanical biosensors
Arlett, J. L., Myers, E. B., & Roukes, M. L. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.44 · Cited by 966
Continuous Recording of Blood Oxygen Tensions by Polarography
Clark, L. C., Wolf, R., Granger, D., & Taylor, Z. (1953) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1953.6.3.189 · Cited by 886
Cited by
The application of nanoparticles in point-of-care testing (POCT) immunoassays
Hou, F., Sun, S., Abdullah, S. W., Tang, Y., Li, X., & Guo, H. (2023) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/d3ay00182b · Cited by 61
Thet, N. T., & Jenkins, A. T. A. (2015) · Electrochemistry Communications · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2015.01.001 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmed, A., Rushworth, J. V., Hirst, N. A., & Millner, P. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 631-646
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W1983450564
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 17.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biosensors for Whole-Cell Bacterial Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00120-13
- The paper
- Ahmed, A., Rushworth, J. V., Hirst, N. A., & Millner, P. A. (2014). Biosensors for Whole-Cell Bacterial Detection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00120-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.