The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Escherichia coli ST131, an Intriguing Clonal Group
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: In 2008, a previously unknown Escherichia coli clonal group, sequence type 131 (ST131), was identified on three continents. Today, ST131 is the predominant E. coli lineage among extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) isolates worldwide. Retrospective studies have suggested that it may originally have risen to prominence as early as 2003. Unlike other classical group B2 ExPEC isolates, ST131 isolates are commonly reported to produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases, such as CTX-M-15, and almost all are resistant to fluoroquinolones. Moreover, ST131 E. coli isolates are considered to be truly pathogenic, due to the spectrum of infections they cause in both community and hospital settings and the large number of virulence-associated genes they contain. ST131 isolates therefore seem to contradict the widely held view that high levels of antimicrobial resistance are necessarily associated with a fitness cost leading to a decrease in pathogenesis. Six years after the first description of E. coli ST131, this review outlines the principal traits of ST131 clonal group isolates, based on the growing body of published data, and highlights what is currently known and what we need to find out to provide public health authorities with better information to help combat ST131.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gupta, K., Hooton, T. M., Naber, K. G., Wullt, B., Colgan, R., Miller, L. G., Moran, G. J., Nicolle, L. E., Raz, R., Schaeffer, A. J., et al. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciq257 · Cited by 3,038
Clermont, O., Christenson, J. K., Denamur, E., & Gordon, D. M. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology Reports · doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12019 · Cited by 1,698
Peirano, G., & Pitout, J. D. D. (2010) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.003 · Cited by 443
Bert, F., Johnson, J. R., Ouattara, B., Leflon-Guibout, V., Johnston, B., Marcon, E., Valla, D., Moreau, R., & Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00516-10 · Cited by 71
Self-citation
Cited by
Epidemiology of β-Lactamase-Producing Pathogens
Bush, K., & Bradford, P. A. (2020) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00047-19 · Cited by 938
Leonard, A. F. C., Zhang, L., Balfour, A. J., Garside, R., Hawkey, P. M., Murray, A. K., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Gaze, W. H. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.11.003 · Cited by 282
Can MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Reasonably Type Bacteria?
Sauget, M., Valot, B., Bertrand, X., & Hocquet, D. (2017) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.006 · Cited by 214
Self-citationWoerther, P.-L., Andremont, A., & Kantele, A. (2017) · Journal of Travel Medicine · doi:10.1093/jtm/taw101 · Cited by 142
Caddey, B., Fisher, S., Barkema, H. W., & Nobrega, D. B. (2025) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00146-22 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H., Bertrand, X., & Madec, J.-Y.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 543-574
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2037378264
- Cited by
- 895
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 38.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Escherichia coli ST131, an Intriguing Clonal Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.00125-13
- The paper
- Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H., Bertrand, X., & Madec, J.-Y. (2014). Escherichia coli ST131, an Intriguing Clonal Group. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00125-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.