Cited by 1,698Escherichia coli research studiesEnterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter ResearchBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The C lermont E scherichia coli phylo‐typing method revisited: improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo‐groups

Clermont, Olivier, Christenson, Julia K., Denamur, Erick, Gordon, David M.·2013·Environmental Microbiology Reports

Abstract

Summary: There is extensive genetic substructure within the species E scherichia coli . In 2000 a simple triplex PCR method was described by C lermont and colleagues that enables an E . coli isolate to be assigned to one of the phylo‐groups A , B 1, B 2 or D . The growing body of multi‐locus sequence data and genome data for E . coli has refined our understanding of E . coli 's phylo‐group structure and eight phylo‐groups are now recognized: seven ( A , B 1, B 2, C , D , E , F ) belong to E . coli sensu stricto , whereas the eighth is the E scherichia cryptic clade I . Here a new PCR ‐based method is developed that enables an E . coli isolate to be assigned to one of the eight phylo‐groups and which allows isolates that are members of the other cryptic clades ( II to V ) of E scherichia to be identified. The development of the method is described and the method is validated. Over 95% of E . coli isolates can be correctly assigned to a phylo‐group. Two collections of human faecal isolates were screened using the new phylo‐group assignment method demonstrating that about 13% of E . coli isolates belong to the newly described phylo‐groups C , E , F and clade I .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1758-2229.12019

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clermont, O., Christenson, J. K., Denamur, E., & Gordon, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • UMR‐S 722 INSERM Paris F‐75018 France
Corresponding author
Clermont, Olivier
Venue
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-24
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
58-65
ISSN
1758-2229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097005840
Cited by
1,698
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 153 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 194 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 156 · 2018: 126 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 13
FWCI
23.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Microbiology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Enterobacteriaceae and Cronobacter Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Escherichia coli, triplex PCR, method validation
MeSH terms
DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Feces, Humans, Phylogeny, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review