The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developments in Fungal Taxonomy
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Fungal infections, especially those caused by opportunistic species, have become substantially more common in recent decades. Numerous species cause human infections, and several new human pathogens are discovered yearly. This situation has created an increasing interest in fungal taxonomy and has led to the development of new methods and approaches to fungal biosystematics which have promoted important practical advances in identification procedures. However, the significance of some data provided by the new approaches is still unclear, and results drawn from such studies may even increase nomenclatural confusion. Analyses of rRNA and rDNA sequences constitute an important complement of the morphological criteria needed to allow clinical fungi to be more easily identified and placed on a single phylogenetic tree. Most of the pathogenic fungi so far described belong to the kingdom Fungi; two belong to the kingdom Chromista. Within the Fungi, they are distributed in three phyla and in 15 orders (Pneumocystidales, Saccharomycetales, Dothideales, Sordariales, Onygenales, Eurotiales, Hypocreales, Ophiostomatales, Microascales, Tremellales, Poriales, Stereales, Agaricales, Schizophyllales, and Ustilaginales).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Determining Divergence Times of the Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms with a Protein Clock
Doolittle, R. F., Feng, D.-F., Tsang, S., Cho, G., & Little, E. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5248.470 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Epidemiology of Invasive Mycoses in North America
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408410903241444 · Cited by 901
Delhaes, L., Monchy, S., Fréalle, E., Hubans, C., Salleron, J., Leroy, S., Prevotat, A., Wallet, F., Wallaert, B., Dei-Cas, E., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036313 · Cited by 347
San-Blas, G., Niño-Vega, G., & Iturriaga, T. (2002) · Medical Mycology · doi:10.1080/714031110 · Cited by 265
Different Brain Regions are Infected with Fungi in Alzheimer’s Disease
Pisa, D., Alonso, R., Rábano, A., Rodal, I., & Carrasco, L. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15015 · Cited by 248
Evolutionary genomics of yeast pathogens in the Saccharomycotina
Gabaldón, T., Naranjo-Ortíz, M. A., & Marcet-Houben, M. (2016) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fow064 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Guarro, J., Gené, J., & Stchigel, A. M.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 454-500
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2165835017
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developments in Fungal Taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.12.3.454
- The paper
- Guarro, J., Gené, J., & Stchigel, A. M. (1999). Developments in Fungal Taxonomy. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.12.3.454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.