Cited by 105Fungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibility

Evolutionary genomics of yeast pathogens in the Saccharomycotina

Open access
Gabaldón, Toni, Naranjo-Ortíz, Miguel A., Marcet-Houben, Marina·2016·FEMS Yeast Research

Abstract

Saccharomycotina comprises a diverse group of yeasts that includes numerous species of industrial or clinical relevance. Opportunistic pathogens within this clade are often assigned to the genus Candida but belong to phylogenetically distant lineages that also comprise non-pathogenic species. This indicates that the ability to infect humans has evolved independently several times among Saccharomycotina. Although the mechanisms of infection of the main groups of Candida pathogens are starting to be unveiled, we still lack sufficient understanding of the evolutionary paths that led to a virulent phenotype in each of the pathogenic lineages. Deciphering what genomic changes underlie the evolutionary emergence of a virulence trait will not only aid the discovery of novel virulence mechanisms but it will also provide valuable information to understand how new pathogens emerge, and what clades may pose a future danger. Here we review recent comparative genomics efforts that have revealed possible evolutionary paths to pathogenesis in different lineages, focusing on the main three agents of candidiasis worldwide: Candida albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata We will discuss what genomic traits may facilitate the emergence of virulence, and focus on two different genome evolution mechanisms able to generate drastic phenotypic changes and which have been associated to the emergence of virulence: gene family expansion and interspecies hybridization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsyr/fow064

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four most common Candida species can account for more than 80% of candidemia cases, and over 30 Candida species have been identified as candidemia agents.

    “although the four most common Candida (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis) can account for more than 80% of the cases, there is a long list with over 30 Candida that have been identified as candidemia agents [9]”
  • Candida opportunistic pathogens belong to distinct lineages that are interspersed with non-pathogenic relatives.

    “When highlighted on a phylogenetic tree, Candida opportunistic pathogens belong to distinct lineages, which are interspersed with non-pathogenic relatives [9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabaldón, T., Naranjo-Ortíz, M. A., & Marcet-Houben, M.
Affiliations
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Gabaldón, Toni
Venue
FEMS Yeast Research
Published
2016-08-03
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
fow064
ISSN
  • 1567-1356 (ISSN-L)
  • 1567-1364
OpenAlex
W2488745281
Cited by
105
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • FEMS Yeast Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (H2020-MSCA-ITN, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, 642095, FP7-PEOPLE-2013, FP7/2007, FP7‐PEOPLE‐ 2013‐ITN, 606786, H2020-MSCA)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (642095, SEV‐2012‐0208, BIO2012-37161)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (MSCA-ITN-2014, FP7/2007-2013, H2020MSCA‐ITN‐2014, H2020-MSCA, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014-642095, 642095, H2020-MSCA-ITN)
  • Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (SGR857)
  • European Regional Development Fund (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014, FP7/2007‐2013, 2007 – 2013)
  • FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN-606786, 2007-2013, 2013‐ITN‐606786, FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN, FP7/2007‐2013/, FP7-PEOPLE-2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Keywords
Saccharomycotina, pathogenic yeasts, Candida, candidiasis, virulence evolution, Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata, comparative genomics, gene family expansion, interspecific hybridization, genome evolution, opportunistic pathogens
MeSH terms
Ascomycota, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics, Virulence Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review