The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rhodococcus equi: an animal and human pathogen
Open accessAbstract
Recent isolations of Rhodococcus equi from cavitatory pulmonary disease in patients with AIDS have aroused interest among medical microbiologists in this unusual organism. Earlier isolations from humans had also been in immunosuppressed patients following hemolymphatic tumors or renal transplantation. This organism has been recognized for many years as a cause of a serious pyogranulomatous pneumonia of young foals and is occasionally isolated from granulomatous lesions in several other species, in some cases following immunosuppression. The last decade has seen many advances in understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and immunity to infection in foals. The particular susceptibility of the foal is not understood but can be explained in part by a combination of heavy challenge through the respiratory route coinciding with declining maternally derived antibody in the absence of fully competent foal cellular immune mechanisms. R. equi is largely a soil organism but is widespread in the feces of herbivores. Its growth in soil is considerably improved by simple nutrients it obtains from herbivore manure. About one-third of human patients who have developed R. equi infections had contact in some way with herbivores or their manure. Others may have acquired infection from contact with soil or wild bird manure. R. equi is an intracellular parasite, which explains the typical pyogranulomatous nature of R. equi infections, the predisposition to infection in human patients with defective cell-mediated immune mechanisms, and the efficacy of antimicrobial drugs that penetrate phagocytic cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Surviving the Acid Test: Responses of Gram-Positive Bacteria to Low pH
Cotter, P. D., & Hill, C. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.3.429-453.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Lang, G., & Buchbauer, G. (2012) · Flavour and Fragrance Journal · doi:10.1002/ffj.2082 · Cited by 397
Bell, Philp, Aw, & Christofi (1998) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00525.x · Cited by 366
Strategies Used by Bacteria to Grow in Macrophages
Mitchell*, G., Chen*, C., & Portnoy, D. A. (2016) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.mchd-0012-2015 · Cited by 137
Glaser, C. A., Angulo, F. J., & Rooney, J. A. (1994) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/18.1.14 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Prescott, J. F.
- Venue
- Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-34
- ISSN
- 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6618
- OpenAlex
- W2155495207
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhodococcus equi: an animal and human pathogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cmr.4.1.20
- The paper
- Prescott, J. F. (1991). Rhodococcus equi: an animal and human pathogen. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.4.1.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.