The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A DNA Vaccine for Ebola Virus Is Safe and Immunogenic in a Phase I Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
Ebola viruses represent a class of filoviruses that causes severe hemorrhagic fever with high mortality. Recognized first in 1976 in the Democratic Republic of Congo, outbreaks continue to occur in equatorial Africa. A safe and effective Ebola virus vaccine is needed because of its continued emergence and its potential for use for biodefense. We report the safety and immunogenicity of an Ebola virus vaccine in its first phase I human study. A three-plasmid DNA vaccine encoding the envelope glycoproteins (GP) from the Zaire and Sudan/Gulu species as well as the nucleoprotein was evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, dose escalation study. Healthy adults, ages 18 to 44 years, were randomized to receive three injections of vaccine at 2 mg ( n = 5), 4 mg ( n = 8), or 8 mg ( n = 8) or placebo ( n = 6). Immunogenicity was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoprecipitation-Western blotting, intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), and enzyme-linked immunospot assay. The vaccine was well-tolerated, with no significant adverse events or coagulation abnormalities. Specific antibody responses to at least one of the three antigens encoded by the vaccine as assessed by ELISA and CD4 + T-cell GP-specific responses as assessed by ICS were detected in 20/20 vaccinees. CD8 + T-cell GP-specific responses were detected by ICS assay in 6/20 vaccinees. This Ebola virus DNA vaccine was safe and immunogenic in humans. Further assessment of the DNA platform alone and in combination with replication-defective adenoviral vector vaccines, in concert with challenge and immune data from nonhuman primates, will facilitate evaluation and potential licensure of an Ebola virus vaccine under the Animal Rule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New Vaccine Technologies to Combat Outbreak Situations
Rauch, S., Jasny, E., Schmidt, K. E., & Petsch, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01963 · Cited by 579
Martin, J. E., Louder, M. K., Holman, L. A., Gordon, I. J., Enama, M. E., Larkin, B. D., Andrews, C. A., Vogel, L., Koup, R. A., Roederer, M., et al. (2008) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.026 · Cited by 267
Self-citationMarburg virus disease: a summary for clinicians
Kortepeter, M. G., Dierberg, K., Shenoy, E. S., & Cieslak, T. J. (2020) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.042 · Cited by 160
Ledgerwood, J. E., Zephir, K., Hu, Z., Wei, C.-J., Chang, L., Enama, M. E., Hendel, C. S., Sitar, S., Bailer, R. T., Koup, R. A., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jit180 · Cited by 123
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J. E., Sullivan, N. J., Enama, M. E., Gordon, I. J., Roederer, M., Koup, R. A., Bailer, R. T., Chakrabarti, B. K., Bailey, M. A., Gomez, P. L., Andrews, C. A., Moodie, Z., Gu, L., Stein, J. A., Nabel, G. J., Graham, B. S., & the VRC 204 Study Team The VRC 204 Study Team includes Margaret M. McCluskey, B. L.
- Venue
- Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1267-1277
- ISSN
- 1556-679X (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6811
- OpenAlex
- W2116128249
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A DNA Vaccine for Ebola Virus Is Safe and Immunogenic in a Phase I Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/cvi.00162-06
- The paper
- Martin, J. E., Sullivan, N. J., Enama, M. E., Gordon, I. J., Roederer, M., Koup, R. A., Bailer, R. T., Chakrabarti, B. K., Bailey, M. A., Gomez, P. L., Andrews, C. A., Moodie, Z., Gu, L., Stein, J. A., Nabel, G. J., Graham, B. S., & the VRC 204 Study Team The VRC 204 Study Team includes Margaret M. McCluskey, B. L. (2006). A DNA Vaccine for Ebola Virus Is Safe and Immunogenic in a Phase I Clinical Trial. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00162-06
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.