The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ribotypes and virulence gene polymorphisms suggest three distinct Listeria monocytogenes lineages with differences in pathogenic potential
Open accessAbstract
A total of 133 Listeria monocytogenes isolates were characterized by ribotyping and allelic analysis of the virulence genes hly, actA, and inlA to uncover linkages between independent phylogenetic and specific virulence markers. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphisms revealed 8 hly, 11 inl4, and 2 actA alleles. The combination of these virulence gene alleles and ribotype patterns separated L. monocytogenes into three distinct lineages. While distinct hly and inlA alleles were generally found to cluster into these three lineages, actA alleles segregated independently. These three phylogenetic lineages were confirmed when 22 partial actA DNA sequences were analyzed. The clinical history of the L. monocytogenes strains showed evidence for differences in pathogenic potential among the three lineages. Lineage I contains all strains isolated during epidemic outbreaks of listeriosis, while no human isolates were found in lineage III. Animal isolates were found in all three lineages. We found evidence that isolates from lineages I and III have a higher plaquing efficiency than lineage II strains in a cell culture assay. Strains from lineage III also seem to form larger plaques than strains from lineage II. A distinctive ribotype fragment and unique 16S rRNA gene sequences furthermore suggest that lineage III might represent a L. monocytogenes subspecies. None of the 20 human isolates available but 11% of our animal isolates were grouped in this lineage, indicating that strains in this lineage might have reduced virulence for humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes
Moura, A., Criscuolo, A., Pouseele, H., Maury, M. M., Leclercq, A., Tarr, C., Björkman, J. T., Dallman, T., Reimer, A., Enouf, V., et al. (2016) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185 · Cited by 668
Variation in Biofilm Formation among Strains of Listeriamonocytogenes
Borucki, M. K., Peppin, J. D., White, D., Loge, F., & Call, D. R. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.12.7336-7342.2003 · Cited by 519
Methods for the isolation and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes: a review
Gasanov, U., Hughes, D., & Hansbro, P. M. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.002 · Cited by 410
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiedmann, M., Bruce, J. L., Keating, C., Johnson, A. E., McDonough, P. L., & Batt, C. A.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2707-2716
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W1899458988
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ribotypes and virulence gene polymorphisms suggest three distinct Listeria monocytogenes lineages with differences in pathogenic potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.65.7.2707-2716.1997
- The paper
- Wiedmann, M., Bruce, J. L., Keating, C., Johnson, A. E., McDonough, P. L., & Batt, C. A. (1997). Ribotypes and virulence gene polymorphisms suggest three distinct Listeria monocytogenes lineages with differences in pathogenic potential. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.65.7.2707-2716.1997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.