The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Innate Antimicrobial Activity of Nasal Secretions
Open accessAbstract
Minimally manipulated nasal secretions, an accessible form of airway surface fluid, were tested against indigenous and added bacteria by using CFU assays. Antimicrobial activity was found to vary between donors and with different target bacteria and was markedly diminished by dilution of the airway secretions. Donor-to-donor differences in electrophoresis patterns of nasal secretions in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and acid urea-PAGE analyses were readily observed, suggesting that polymorphic genes encode the secreted proteins. Three donors (of twenty-four total), whose nasal fluid yielded similar protein band patterns and did not kill indigenous bacteria, were determined to be heavy nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus . Their fluid was deficient in microbicidal activity toward a colonizing strain of S. aureus but the defect was corrected in vitro by a 1:1 addition of nasal fluid from noncarriers. The microbicidal activity of normal fluid was inactivated by heating it for 10 min to 100°C and could not be restored solely by the addition of two major nasal antimicrobial proteins, lysozyme and lactoferrin. Several other known antimicrobial proteins and peptides, including statherin, secretory phospholipase A 2 , and defensins, were identified in nasal secretions and likely contribute to their total antimicrobial properties. Nasal fluid may serve as a useful model for the analysis of lower-airway secretions and their role in host defense against airway colonization and pulmonary infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections
Wertheim, H. F., Melles, D. C., Vos, M. C., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Nouwen, J. L. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4 · Cited by 2,685
Pathophysiology and Management of Pulmonary Infections in Cystic Fibrosis
Gibson, R. L., Burns, J. L., & Ramsey, B. W. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200304-505so · Cited by 1,633
Mucus clearance as a primary innate defense mechanism for mammalian airways
Knowles, M. R., & Boucher, R. C. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci0215217 · Cited by 1,054
A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development
Singh, P. K., Parsek, M. R., Greenberg, E. P., & Welsh, M. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417552a · Cited by 1,026
Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials
Hancock, R. E. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00092-5 · Cited by 978
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, A. M., Dewan, P., & Ganz, T.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3267-3275
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2147049357
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innate Antimicrobial Activity of Nasal Secretions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.67.7.3267-3275.1999
- The paper
- Cole, A. M., Dewan, P., & Ganz, T. (1999). Innate Antimicrobial Activity of Nasal Secretions. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.67.7.3267-3275.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.