The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Biofilms Formed by Candidaalbicans and Candidaparapsilosis on Bioprosthetic Surfaces
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about fungal biofilms, which may cause infection and antibiotic resistance. In this study, biofilm formation by different Candida species, particularly Candidaalbicans and C.parapsilosis, was evaluated by using a clinically relevant model of Candida biofilm on medical devices.Candida biofilms were allowed to form on silicone elastomer and were quantified by tetrazolium (XTT) and dry weight (DW) assays. Formed biofilm was visualized by using fluorescence microscopy and confocal scanning laser microscopy with Calcofluor White (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), concanavalin A-Alexafluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.), and FUN-1 (Molecular Probes) dyes. Although minimal variations in biofilm production among invasive C.albicans isolates were seen, significant differences between invasive and noninvasive isolates (P< 0.001) were noted.C.albicans isolates produced more biofilm than C.parapsilosis,C.glabrata, and C.tropicalis isolates, as determined by DW assays (P was <0.001 for all comparisons) and microscopy. Interestingly, noninvasive isolates demonstrated a higher level of XTT activity than invasive isolates. On microscopy,C.albicans biofilms had a morphology different from that of other species, consisting of a basal blastospore layer with a dense overlying matrix composed of exopolysaccharides and hyphae. In contrast,C.parapsilosis biofilms had less volume than C.albicans biofilms and were comprised exclusively of clumped blastospores. Unlike planktonically grown cells,Candida biofilms rapidly (within 6 h) developed fluconazole resistance (MIC, >128 μg/ml). Importantly, XTT and FUN-1 activity showed biofilm cells to be metabolically active. In conclusion, our data show that C.albicans produces quantitatively larger and qualitatively more complex biofilms than other species, in particular,C.parapsilosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O'toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,086
Ceri, H., Olson, M. E., Stremick, C., Read, R. R., Morck, D., & Buret, A. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.37.6.1771-1776.1999 · Cited by 2,155
Lewis, K. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.4.999-1007.2001 · Cited by 1,980
Chandra, J., Kuhn, D. M., Mukherjee, P. K., Hoyer, L. L., McCormick, T., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2001) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.183.18.5385-5394.2001 · Cited by 1,578
Self-citationGuidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections
Mermel, L. A., Farr, B. M., Sherertz, R. J., Raad, I. I., O'Grady, N., Harris, J. S., & Craven, D. E. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/320001 · Cited by 1,449
Cited by
Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00029-06 · Cited by 4,174
Candida biofilms and their role in infection
Douglas, L. J. (2003) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(02)00002-1 · Cited by 1,150
Candida Infections of Medical Devices
Kojic, E. M., & Darouiche, R. O. (2004) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.17.2.255-267.2004 · Cited by 1,055
Silva, S., Negri, M., Henriques, M., Oliveira, R., Williams, D. W., & Azeredo, J. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00278.x · Cited by 969
Candida parapsilosis, an Emerging Fungal Pathogen
Trofa, D., Gácser, A., & Nosanchuk, J. D. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00013-08 · Cited by 854
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuhn, D. M., Chandra, J., Mukherjee, P. K., & Ghannoum, M. A.
- Venue
- Infection and Immunity
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 878-888
- ISSN
- 0019-9567 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5522
- OpenAlex
- W2104246944
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Biofilms Formed by Candidaalbicans and Candidaparapsilosis on Bioprosthetic Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/iai.70.2.878-888.2002
- The paper
- Kuhn, D. M., Chandra, J., Mukherjee, P. K., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2002). Comparison of Biofilms Formed by Candidaalbicans and Candidaparapsilosis on Bioprosthetic Surfaces. Infection and Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.70.2.878-888.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.