Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variation among Genome Sequences of H37Rv Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Multiple Laboratories

Open access
Ioerger, Thomas R., Feng, Yicheng, Ganesula, Krishna, Chen, Xiaohua, Dobos, Karen M., Fortune, Sarah, Jacobs, William R., Mizrahi, Valerie, Parish, Tanya, Rubin, Eric, Sassetti, Chris, Sacchettini, James C.·2010·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

The publication of the complete genome sequence for Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv in 1998 has had a great impact on the research community. Nonetheless, it is suspected that genetic differences have arisen in stocks of H37Rv that are maintained in different laboratories. In order to assess the consistency of the genome sequences among H37Rv strains in use and the extent to which they have diverged from the original strain sequenced, we carried out whole-genome sequencing on six strains of H37Rv from different laboratories. Polymorphisms at 73 sites were observed, which were shared among the lab strains, though 72 of these were also shared with H37Ra and are likely to be due to sequencing errors in the original H37Rv reference sequence. An updated H37Rv genome sequence should be valuable to the tuberculosis research community as well as the broader microbial research community. In addition, several polymorphisms unique to individual strains and several shared polymorphisms were identified and shown to be consistent with the known provenance of these strains. Aside from nucleotide substitutions and insertion/deletions, multiple IS 6110 transposition events were observed, supporting the theory that they play a significant role in plasticity of the M. tuberculosis genome. This genome-wide catalog of genetic differences can help explain any phenotypic differences that might be found, including a frameshift mutation in the mycocerosic acid synthase gene which causes two of the strains to be deficient in biosynthesis of the surface glycolipid phthiocerol dimycocerosate (PDIM). The resequencing of these six lab strains represents a fortuitous “ in vitro evolution” experiment that demonstrates how the M. tuberculosis genome continues to evolve even in a controlled environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.00166-10

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Ioerger, T. R., Feng, Y., Ganesula, K., Chen, X., Dobos, K. M., Fortune, S., Jacobs, W. R., Mizrahi, V., Parish, T., Rubin, E., Sassetti, C., & Sacchettini, J. C.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
192
Issue
14
Pages
3645-3653
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W2124075951
Cited by
225
References
3
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation among Genome Sequences of H37Rv Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Multiple Laboratories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.00166-10
The paper
Ioerger, T. R., Feng, Y., Ganesula, K., Chen, X., Dobos, K. M., Fortune, S., Jacobs, W. R., Mizrahi, V., Parish, T., Rubin, E., Sassetti, C., & Sacchettini, J. C. (2010). Variation among Genome Sequences of H37Rv Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Multiple Laboratories. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00166-10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.