The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Streptococcal Antagonism in Oral Biofilms:Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii Interference with Streptococcus mutans
Open accessAbstract
Biofilms are polymicrobial, with diverse bacterial species competing for limited space and nutrients. Under healthy conditions, the different species in biofilms maintain an ecological balance. This balance can be disturbed by environmental factors and interspecies interactions. These perturbations can enable dominant growth of certain species, leading to disease. To model clinically relevant interspecies antagonism, we studied three well-characterized and closely related oral species,Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus sanguinis, and cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. S. sanguinis and S. gordonii used oxygen availability and the differential production of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2) to compete effectively against S. mutans. Interspecies antagonism was influenced by glucose with reduced production of H 2 O 2. Furthermore, aerobic conditions stimulated the competence system and the expression of the bacteriocin mutacin IV of S. mutans, as well as the H 2 O 2-dependent release of heterologous DNA from mixed cultures of S. sanguinis and S. gordonii. These data provide new insights into ecological factors that determine the outcome of competition between pioneer colonizing oral streptococci and the survival mechanisms of S. mutans in the oral biofilm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regev-Yochay, G., Trzciński, K., Thompson, C. M., Malley, R., & Lipsitch, M. (2006) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00317-06 · Cited by 201
Nobbs, A. H., Zhang, Y., Khammanivong, A., & Herzberg, M. C. (2007) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01535-06 · Cited by 53 · cited 3×
“adhesion-binding sites on the saliva-coated tooth surface (31)”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Streptococcus Adherence and Colonization
Nobbs, A. H., Lamont, R. J., & Jenkinson, H. F. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00014-09 · Cited by 657
The Exopolysaccharide Matrix: A Virulence Determinant of Cariogenic Biofilm
Koo, H., Falsetta, M. L., & Klein, M. I. (2013) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034513504218 · Cited by 523
Abranches, J., Zeng, L., Kajfasz, J. K., Palmer, S. R., Chakraborty, B., Wen, Z. T., Richards, V. P., Brady, L. J., & Lemos, J. A. (2018) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0042-2018 · Cited by 502
Advances in the microbial etiology and pathogenesis of early childhood caries
Hajishengallis, E., Parsaei, Y., Klein, M. I., & Koo, H. (2017) · Molecular Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1111/omi.12152 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreth, J., Zhang, Y., & Herzberg, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4632-4640
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2110621364
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Streptococcal Antagonism in Oral Biofilms:Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii Interference with Streptococcus mutans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.00276-08
- The paper
- Kreth, J., Zhang, Y., & Herzberg, M. C. (2008). Streptococcal Antagonism in Oral Biofilms:Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus gordonii Interference with Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00276-08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.