The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellulose as an Architectural Element in Spatially Structured Escherichia coli Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Morphological form in multicellular aggregates emerges from the interplay of genetic constitution and environmental signals. Bacterial macrocolony biofilms, which form intricate three-dimensional structures, such as large and often radially oriented ridges, concentric rings, and elaborate wrinkles, provide a unique opportunity to understand this interplay of “nature and nurture” in morphogenesis at the molecular level. Macrocolony morphology depends on self-produced extracellular matrix components. In Escherichia coli , these are stationary phase-induced amyloid curli fibers and cellulose. While the widely used “domesticated” E. coli K-12 laboratory strains are unable to generate cellulose, we could restore cellulose production and macrocolony morphology of E. coli K-12 strain W3110 by “repairing” a single chromosomal SNP in the bcs operon. Using scanning electron and fluorescence microscopy, cellulose filaments, sheets and nanocomposites with curli fibers were localized in situ at cellular resolution within the physiologically two-layered macrocolony biofilms of this “de-domesticated” strain. As an architectural element, cellulose confers cohesion and elasticity, i.e., tissue-like properties that—together with the cell-encasing curli fiber network and geometrical constraints in a growing colony—explain the formation of long and high ridges and elaborate wrinkles of wild-type macrocolonies. In contrast, a biofilm matrix consisting of the curli fiber network only is brittle and breaks into a pattern of concentric dome-shaped rings separated by deep crevices. These studies now set the stage for clarifying how regulatory networks and in particular c-di-GMP signaling operate in the three-dimensional space of highly structured and “tissue-like” bacterial biofilms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experiments in molecular genetics
Miller, J. H. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 27,157
One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products
Datsenko, K. A., & Wanner, B. L. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.120163297 · Cited by 14,782
Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W., & Stoodley, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro821 · Cited by 7,143
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review
Siró, I., & Plackett, D. (2010) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y · Cited by 2,883
Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
Cyclic di-GMP: the First 25 Years of a Universal Bacterial Second Messenger
Römling, U., Galperin, M. Y., & Gomelsky, M. (2013) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00043-12 · Cited by 1,700
Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria
Hengge, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2109 · Cited by 1,578
Self-citationImproved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions
Simons, R. W., Houman, F., & Kleckner, N. (1987) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(87)90095-3 · Cited by 1,518
Watnick, P., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.10.2675-2679.2000 · Cited by 1,435
Cited by
Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life
Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Steinberg, P., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94 · Cited by 5,979
Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPSs) in Ocean Systems
Decho, A. W., & Gutierrez, T. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00922 · Cited by 733
Hobley, L., Harkins, C., MacPhee, C. E., & Stanley-Wall, N. R. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv015 · Cited by 581
“At the upper, air-exposed, side of the pellicle, the (apparently ovoid) cells were covered in a matrix composed of very densely packed fibres that formed ‘basket-like’ structures surrounding the E. coli in the biofilm (McCrate et al. 2013; Serra, Richter and Hengge 2013a).”
BackgroundBacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions
Römling, U., & Galperin, M. Y. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005 · Cited by 573
A Molecular Description of Cellulose Biosynthesis
McNamara, J. T., Morgan, J. L. W., & Zimmer, J. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Serra, D. O., Richter, A. M., & Hengge, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2013-12-15
- Volume
- 195
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5540-5554
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2156752198
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulose as an Architectural Element in Spatially Structured Escherichia coli Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.00946-13
- The paper
- Serra, D. O., Richter, A. M., & Hengge, R. (2013). Cellulose as an Architectural Element in Spatially Structured Escherichia coli Biofilms. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00946-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.