Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 Produces Cobalamin-Dependent Diol Dehydratase in Metabolosomes and Metabolizes 1,2-Propanediol by Disproportionation
Open accessAbstract
A Lactobacillus reuteri strain isolated from sourdough is known to produce the vitamin cobalamin. The organism requires this for glycerol cofermentation by a cobalamin-dependent enzyme, usually termed glycerol dehydratase, in the synthesis of the antimicrobial substance reuterin. We show that the cobalamin-synthesizing capacity of another L. reuteri strain (20016, the type strain, isolated from the human gut and recently sequenced as F275) is genetically and phenotypically linked, as in the Enterobacteriaceae , to the production of a cobalamin-dependent enzyme which is associated with a bacterial microcompartment (metabolosome) and known as diol dehydratase. We show that this enzyme allows L. reuteri to carry out a disproportionation reaction converting 1,2-propanediol to propionate and propanol. The wide distribution of this operon suggests that it is adapted to horizontal transmission between bacteria. However, there are significant genetic and phenotypic differences between the Lactobacillus background and the Enterobacteriaceae . Electron microscopy reveals that the bacterial microcompartment in L. reuteri occupies a smaller percentage of the cytoplasm than in gram-negative bacteria. DNA sequence data show evidence of a regulatory control mechanism different from that in gram-negative bacteria, with the presence of a catabolite-responsive element (CRE) sequence immediately upstream of the pdu operon encoding diol dehydratase and metabolosome structural genes in L. reuteri . The metabolosome-associated diol dehydratase we describe is the only candidate glycerol dehydratase present on inspection of the L. reuteri F275 genome sequence.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several organisms, including Lb. diolivorans and Lb. reuteri, have the capability to further metabolize 1,2-propanediol to propanol and propionic acid.
“Several organisms, including Lb. diolivorans (Krooneman et al., 2002) and Lb.reuteri (Sriramulu et al., 2008), have this capability”
From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Sriramulu et al., 2008
A complex of 22 enzymes is linked to degradation of 1,2-propanediol to non-equimolar levels of 1-propanol or propionic acid, with propionaldehyde as an intermediate.
“A complex of 22 enzymes has been shown to be linked to the degradation of 1,2-propanediol to non-equimolar levels of 1-propanol (reduced) or propionic acid (oxidized), with propionaldehyde as an intermediate in the reaction [70,71].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Sriramulu, D. D., Liang, M., Hernandez-Romero, D., Raux-Deery, E., Lünsdorf, H., Parsons, J. B., Warren, M. J., & Prentice, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Departments of Microbiology
- Protein Science Group, Department of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, United Kingdom
- Department of Vaccinology, Helmholtz Center of Infection Research, Braunschweig, D-38124, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Prentice, Michael B.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4559-4567
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- PMC
- PMC2446795
- OpenAlex
- W2169586458
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Bacteriology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HZI (Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research) (submittedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Joint Genome Institute
- Science Foundation Ireland
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E010563/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus reuteri, vitamin B12, diol dehydratase, bacterial microcompartments, propylene glycol, disproportionation, glycerol dehydratase, reuterin, vitamin B12 biosynthesis, catabolite-responsive element, horizontal gene transfer, propionate, propanol, sourdough
- MeSH terms
- 1-Propanol, Bacterial Proteins, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Glyceraldehyde, Models, Chemical, Molecular Sequence Data, Operon, Propane, Propanediol Dehydratase, Propionates, Vitamin B 12, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Propylene Glycol, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Limosilactobacillus reuteri
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review