The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Formate as an Intermediate in the Bovine Rumen Fermentation
Open accessAbstract
An average of 11 (range, 2 to 47) μmoles of formate per g per hr was produced and used in whole bovine rumen contents incubated in vitro, as calculated from the product of the specific turnover rate constant, k , times the concentration of intercellular formate. The latter varied between 5 and 26 (average, 12) nmoles/g. The concentration of formate in the total rumen contents was as much as 1,000 times greater, presumably owing to formate within the microbial cells. The concentration of formate in rumen contents minus most of the plant solids was varied, and from the rates of methanogenesis the Michaelis constant, K m , for formate conversion to CH 4 was estimated at 30 nmoles/g. Also, the dissolved H 2 was measured in relation to methane production, and a K m of 1 nmole/g was obtained. A pure culture of Methanobacterium ruminantium showed a K m of 1 nmole of H 2 /g, but the K m for formate was much higher than the 30 nmoles for the rumen contents. It is concluded that nonmethanogenic microbes metabolize intercellular formate in the rumen. CO 2 and H 2 are the principal substrates for rumen methanogenesis. Eighteen per cent of the rumen methane is derived from formate, as calculated from the intercellular concentration of hydrogen and formate in the rumen, the Michaelis constants for conversion of these substrates by rumen liquid, and the relative capacities of whole rumen contents to ferment these substrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Janssen, P. H. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 · Cited by 836
Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J., & Bryant, M. P. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_2 · Cited by 772
Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants
Morgavi, D. P., Forano, E., Martin, C., & Newbold, C. J. (2010) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731110000546 · Cited by 694
Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review
Pavlostathis, S. G., & Giraldo‐Gomez, E. (1991) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Control · doi:10.1080/10643389109388424 · Cited by 675
Metadata
- Authors
- Hungate, R. E., Smith, W., Bauchop, T., Yu, I., & Rabinowitz, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1970-05
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 389-397
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2061775701
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formate as an Intermediate in the Bovine Rumen Fermentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.102.2.389-397.1970
- The paper
- Hungate, R. E., Smith, W., Bauchop, T., Yu, I., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1970). Formate as an Intermediate in the Bovine Rumen Fermentation. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.102.2.389-397.1970
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.