The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with beta-lactams in intact cells
Open accessAbstract
Wild-type Escherichia coli K-12 produces two porins, OmpF (protein 1a) and OmpC (protein 1b). In mutants deficient in both of these "normal" porins, secondary mutants that produce a "new" porin, protein PhoE (protein E), are selected for. We determined the properties of the channels produced by each of these porins by measuring the rates of diffusion of various cephalosporins through the outer membrane in strains producing only one porin species. We found that all porin channels retarded the diffusion of more hydrophobic cephalosporins and that with monoanionic cephalosporins a 10-fold increase in the octanol-water partition coefficient of the solute produced a 5- to 6-fold decrease in the rate of penetration. Electrical charges of the solutes had different effects on different channels. Thus, with the normal porins (i.e., OmpF and OmpC proteins) additional negative charge drastically reduced the penetration rate through the channels, whereas additional positive charge significantly accelerated the penetration. In contrast, diffusion through the PhoE channel was unaffected by the presence of an additional negative charge. We hypothesize that the relative exclusion of hydrophobic and negatively charged solutes by normal porin channels is of ecological advantage to E. coli, which must exclude hydrophobic and anionic bile salts in its natural habitat. The properties of the PhoE porin are also consistent with the recent finding (M. Argast and W. Boos, J. Bacteriol. 143:142-150, 1980; J. Tommassen and B. Lugtenberg, J. Bacteriol. 143:151-157, 1980) that its biosynthesis is derepressed by phosphate starvation; the channel may thus act as an emergency pore primarily for the uptake of phosphate and phosphorylated compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited
Nikaido, H. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.4.593-656.2003 · Cited by 4,316
Self-citationMechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons
Sikkema, J., de Bont, J. A., & Poolman, B. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.2.201-222.1995 · Cited by 2,685
“However, it has a surprisingly high transfer resistance to hydrophobic compounds (219).”
BackgroundInfluentialPrevention of Drug Access to Bacterial Targets: Permeability Barriers and Active Efflux
Nikaido, H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8153625 · Cited by 1,540
Self-citationPorin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with liposomes reconstituted from purified proteins
Nikaido, H., & Rosenberg, E. Y. (1983) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.153.1.241-252.1983 · Cited by 448
Self-citationPreventing drug access to targets: cell surface permeability barriers and active efflux in bacteria
Nikaido, H. (2001) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/scdb.2000.0247 · Cited by 317
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikaido, H., Rosenberg, E. Y., & Foulds, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 232-240
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2117378912
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with beta-lactams in intact cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.153.1.232-240.1983
- The paper
- Nikaido, H., Rosenberg, E. Y., & Foulds, J. (1983). Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with beta-lactams in intact cells. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.153.1.232-240.1983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.