Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regeneration of insertionally inactivated streptococcal DNA fragments after excision of transposon Tn916 in Escherichia coli: strategy for targeting and cloning of genes from gram-positive bacteria

Open access
Gawron-Burke, C, Clewell, D B·1984·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

The conjugative transposon Tn916 (15 kilobases), originally identified in Streptococcus faecalis DS16, has been cloned as an intact element on the pBR322-derived vector pGL101 in Escherichia coli. The EcoRI F' (EcoRI F::Tn916) fragment of pAM211 (pAD1::Tn916) was cloned into the single EcoRI site of pGL101 to form the chimera, pAM120, by selecting for the expression of Tn916-encoded tetracycline resistance (Tcr). Interestingly, in the absence of continued selection for Tcr, Tn916 excised from pAM120 at high frequency. This excision event resulted in a plasmid species consisting of the pGL101 vector and a 2.7-kilobase restriction fragment comigrating with the EcoRI F fragment of pAD1 during agarose gel electrophoresis. Filter blot hybridization experiments showed the 2.7-kilobase fragment generated as a result of Tn916 excision to be homologous with the EcoRI F fragment of pAD1. Analogous results were obtained with another chimera, pAM170, generated by ligating the EcoRI D' (EcoRI D::Tn916) fragment of pAM210 (pAD1::Tn916) to EcoRI-digested pGL101. Comparison of the AluI and RsaI cleavage patterns of the EcoRI F fragment isolated after Tn916 excision with those from an EcoRI F fragment derived from pAD1 failed to detect any difference in the two fragments: data in support of a precise Tn916 excision event in E. coli. Subcloning experiments showed that an intact transposon was required for Tn916 excision and located the Tcr determinant near the single HindIII site on Tn916. Although excision occurred with high frequency in E. coli, Tn916 insertion into the E. coli chromosome was a much rarer event. Tcr transformants were not obtained when pAM120 DNA was used to transform a polA1 strain, E. coli C2368.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.159.1.214-221.1984

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Gawron-Burke, C., & Clewell, D. B.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1984-07
Volume
159
Issue
1
Pages
214-221
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W1540797945
Cited by
261
References
0
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regeneration of insertionally inactivated streptococcal DNA fragments after excision of transposon Tn916 in Escherichia coli: strategy for targeting and cloning of genes from gram-positive bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.159.1.214-221.1984
The paper
Gawron-Burke, C., & Clewell, D. B. (1984). Regeneration of insertionally inactivated streptococcal DNA fragments after excision of transposon Tn916 in Escherichia coli: strategy for targeting and cloning of genes from gram-positive bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.159.1.214-221.1984

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.