Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Purification of a second alternative nitrogenase from a nifHDK deletion strain of Azotobacter vinelandii

Open access
Chisnell, J R, Premakumar, R, Bishop, P E·1988·Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

A second alternative nitrogenase complex (nitrogenase 3) was purified from a nifHDK deletion strain of Azotobacter vinelandii. The active complex is made up of two components, dinitrogenase 3 and dinitrogenase reductase 3. Dinitrogenase 3 contains two protein subunits (alpha, Mr 58,000, and beta, Mr 50,000) which assemble into at least two active configurations: alpha 2 beta 2 (dinitrogenase 3s) and alpha 1 beta 2 (dinitrogenase 3F). Dinitrogenase 3s contains 24 Fe and 18 acid-labile S2-ions per Mr 216,000, and dinitrogenase 3F contains 11 Fe and 9 acid-labile S2-ions per Mr 158,000. Dinitrogenase reductase 3 is composed of two protein subunits of identical Mr (32,500) and contains four Fe and four acid-labile S2- ions per Mr 65,000. On two-dimensional gels, the protein subunits of the nitrogenase 3 complex comigrated with the four Mo-, V-, and NH4+-repressible proteins originally designated as N2ase B: the nitrogenase hypothesized to exist in the alternative N2 fixation system first described in 1980 (P.E. Bishop, D. M. L. Jarlenski, and D. R. Hetherington, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:7342-7346, 1980). Neutron activation analysis indicated that the nitrogenase 3 complex lacked significant amounts of Mo, V, Cr, Re, and W. Some Zn, however, was found in the dinitrogenase 3S and dinitrogenase 3F preparations. The pattern of substrate reduction efficiency was H+ greater than N2 greater than C2H2. The maximum specific activity found for N2 reduction was 38 nmol of NH3 per min per mg of protein (dinitrogenase 3S). Nitrogenase 3 was found to be extremely sensitive to O2, and activities could not be reproducibly maintained during freezing and thawing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jb.170.1.27-33.1988

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Chisnell, J. R., Premakumar, R., & Bishop, P. E.
Venue
Journal of Bacteriology
Published
1988-01
Volume
170
Issue
1
Pages
27-33
ISSN
  • 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5530
OpenAlex
W1849451321
Cited by
270
References
15
FWCI
30.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Purification of a second alternative nitrogenase from a nifHDK deletion strain of Azotobacter vinelandii. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.170.1.27-33.1988
The paper
Chisnell, J. R., Premakumar, R., & Bishop, P. E. (1988). Purification of a second alternative nitrogenase from a nifHDK deletion strain of Azotobacter vinelandii. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.1.27-33.1988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.