The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cofactor Engineering: a Novel Approach to Metabolic Engineering in Lactococcus lactis by Controlled Expression of NADH Oxidase
Open accessAbstract
NADH oxidase-overproducing Lactococcus lactis strains were constructed by cloning the Streptococcus mutans nox-2 gene, which encodes the H 2 O-forming NADH oxidase, on the plasmid vector pNZ8020 under the control of the L. lactis nisA promoter. This engineered system allowed a nisin-controlled 150-fold overproduction of NADH oxidase at pH 7.0, resulting in decreased NADH/NAD ratios under aerobic conditions. Deliberate variations on NADH oxidase activity provoked a shift from homolactic to mixed-acid fermentation during aerobic glucose catabolism. The magnitude of this shift was directly dependent on the level of NADH oxidase overproduced. At an initial growth pH of 6.0, smaller amounts of nisin were required to optimize NADH oxidase overproduction, but maximum NADH oxidase activity was twofold lower than that found at pH 7.0. Nonetheless at the highest induction levels, levels of pyruvate flux redistribution were almost identical at both initial pH values. Pyruvate was mostly converted to acetoin or diacetyl via α-acetolactate synthase instead of lactate and was not converted to acetate due to flux limitation through pyruvate dehydrogenase. The activity of the overproduced NADH oxidase could be increased with exogenously added flavin adenine dinucleotide. Under these conditions, lactate production was completely absent. Lactate dehydrogenase remained active under all conditions, indicating that the observed metabolic effects were only due to removal of the reduced cofactor. These results indicate that the observed shift from homolactic to mixed-acid fermentation under aerobic conditions is mainly modulated by the level of NADH oxidation resulting in low NADH/NAD + ratios in the cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Complete Genome Sequence of the Lactic Acid Bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403
Bolotin, A., Wincker, P., Mauger, S., Jaillon, O., Malarme, K., Weissenbach, J., Ehrlich, S. D., & Sorokin, A. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.gr-1697r · Cited by 1,139
Stress Physiology of Lactic Acid Bacteria.
Papadimitriou, K., Alegría, Á., Bron, P. A., de Angelis, M., Gobbetti, M., Kleerebezem, M., Lemos, J. A., Linares, D. M., Ross, P., Stanton, C., et al. (2016) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00076-15 · Cited by 914
Self-citationStress responses in lactic acid bacteria
van de Guchte, M., Serror, P., Chervaux, C., Smokvina, T., Ehrlich, S. D., & Maguin, E. (2002) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1020631532202 · Cited by 648
Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: perspectives and challenges
Welman, A. D., & Maddox, I. S. (2003) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(03)00107-0 · Cited by 522
A review on Lactococcus lactis: from food to factory
Song, A. A.-L., In, L. L. A., Lim, S. H. E., & Rahim, R. A. (2017) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-017-0669-x · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopez de Felipe, F., Kleerebezem, M., de Vos, W. M., & Hugenholtz, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3804-3808
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2170359524
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cofactor Engineering: a Novel Approach to Metabolic Engineering in Lactococcus lactis by Controlled Expression of NADH Oxidase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.180.15.3804-3808.1998
- The paper
- Lopez de Felipe, F., Kleerebezem, M., de Vos, W. M., & Hugenholtz, J. (1998). Cofactor Engineering: a Novel Approach to Metabolic Engineering in Lactococcus lactis by Controlled Expression of NADH Oxidase. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.180.15.3804-3808.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.