The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis Reveals Genetic Relationships within Bacillus anthracis
Open accessAbstract
Bacillus anthracis is one of the most genetically homogeneous pathogens described, making strain discrimination particularly difficult. In this paper, we present a novel molecular typing system based on rapidly evolving variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) loci. Multiple-locus VNTR analysis (MLVA) uses the combined power of multiple alleles at several marker loci. In our system, fluorescently labeled PCR primers are used to produce PCR amplification products from eight VNTR regions in the B. anthracis genome. These are detected and their sizes are determined using an ABI377 automated DNA sequencer. Five of these eight loci were discovered by sequence characterization of molecular markers ( vrrC 1 , vrrC 2 , vrrB 1 , vrrB 2 , and CG3), two were discovered by searching complete plasmid nucleotide sequences (pXO1-aat and pXO2-at), and one was known previously ( vrrA ). MLVA characterization of 426 B. anthracis isolates identified 89 distinct genotypes. VNTR markers frequently identified multiple alleles (from two to nine), with Nei's diversity values between 0.3 and 0.8. Unweighted pair-group method arithmetic average cluster analysis identified six genetically distinct groups that appear to be derived from clones. Some of these clones show worldwide distribution, while others are restricted to particular geographic regions. Human commerce doubtlessly has contributed to the dispersal of particular clones in ancient and modern times.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes
van Belkum, A., Scherer, S., van Alphen, L., & Verbrugh, H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.2.275-293.1998 · Cited by 737
Cited by
BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level
Jolley, K. A., & Maiden, M. C. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-595 · Cited by 2,368
Mock, M., & Fouet, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.647 · Cited by 894
Genomics of the group of organisms
RASKO, D., ALTHERR, M., HAN, C., & RAVEL, J. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005 · Cited by 470
Microevolution and history of the plague bacillus, Yersinia pestis
Achtman, M., Morelli, G., Zhu, P., Wirth, T., Diehl, I., Kusecek, B., Vogler, A. J., Wagner, D. M., Allender, C. J., Easterday, W. R., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408026101 · Cited by 440
Self-citationLindstedt, B. (2005) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200500096 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Keim, P., Price, L. B., Klevytska, A. M., Smith, K. L., Schupp, J. M., Okinaka, R., Jackson, P. J., & Hugh-Jones, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2000-05-15
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2928-2936
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2145282362
- Cited by
- 729
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis Reveals Genetic Relationships within Bacillus anthracis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.182.10.2928-2936.2000
- The paper
- Keim, P., Price, L. B., Klevytska, A. M., Smith, K. L., Schupp, J. M., Okinaka, R., Jackson, P. J., & Hugh-Jones, M. E. (2000). Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis Reveals Genetic Relationships within Bacillus anthracis. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.182.10.2928-2936.2000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.